Literature DB >> 18823749

Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.

William J Long1, Giles R Scuderi.   

Abstract

Sixteen cases of revision total knee arthroplasty requiring the use of porous tantalum tibial cones for 2 T2A, 3 T2B, 4 T3A, and 7 T3B tibial bone defects (Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification) after 13 cases of aseptic loosening and 3 cases of staged reimplantation for infection were reviewed. At an average 31 months (24-38), no patients were lost to follow-up. There were 2 cases of recurrent sepsis requiring removal of a well-fixed cone. In the remaining 14 cases, the reconstructions were functioning well with no reoperations. Radiographs demonstrated reestablishment of the joint line, neutral mechanical axis (average, 5.4 degrees of valgus), and signs of stable osteointegration into the cones. Good short-term results were achieved in complex revisions, with these new reconstructive tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823749     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

1.  Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Results of sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: an editorial comment on recently published in the Journal of Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 3.  Revision arthroplasty: an update.

Authors:  D Williams; A Taylor; P McLardy-Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: the end of the allograft era?

Authors:  Sébastien Parratte; Matthew P Abdel; Alexandre Lunebourg; Nicolaas Budhiparama; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-10

5.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

6.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.

Authors:  Catherine J Fedorka; Antonia F Chen; Michael R Pagnotto; Lawrence S Crossett; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.

Authors:  Nemandra A Sandiford; Peter Misur; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Risk factors for aseptic loosening in complex revision total knee arthroplasty using rotating hinge implants.

Authors:  Ali Levent; Eduardo M Suero; Thorsten Gehrke; Iman Godarzi Bakhtiari; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Vincenzo De Santis; Peter K Sculco; Rocco D'Apolito; Joseph B Assini; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Histological ex vivo analysis of retrieved human tantalum augmentations.

Authors:  Stefan Breer; Michael Hahn; Daniel Kendoff; Matthias Krause; Till Koehne; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Michael Amling; Matthias Gebauer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.