Literature DB >> 18171960

Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.

R Michael Meneghini1, David G Lewallen, Arlen D Hanssen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The best treatment method for large tibial bone defects during revision knee replacement has not been established. The purpose of this study was to determine the initial results obtained with a unique reconstructive implant, the porous tantalum metaphyseal cone, designed as an alternative treatment for severe tibial bone loss following total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones were implanted during fifteen revision total knee replacements in eight women and seven men who had an average age of 68.1 years at the time of the procedure. The patients had had an average of 3.5 prior total knee replacements. According to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, eight knees had a Type-3 defect and seven knees had a Type-2B bone defect. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically.
RESULTS: The patients were followed for an average of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to forty-seven months). Overall, the average Knee Society clinical scores improved from 52 points preoperatively to 85 points at the time of the final follow-up. At the final follow-up evaluation, all fifteen porous metaphyseal cones showed evidence of osseointegration with reactive osseous trabeculation at points of contact with the tibia. There was no evidence of loosening or migration of any of these tibial reconstructions at the time of final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: At the time of short-term follow-up, the porous tantalum metaphyseal tibial cones effectively provided structural support for the tibial implants in this series. The potential for long-term biologic fixation may provide durability for these tibial reconstructions. Long-term follow-up and comparison with alternative reconstructive techniques will be required to evaluate the true effectiveness of this treatment approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18171960     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  47 in total

1.  Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Limb-sparing surgery using tantalum metal endoprosthesis in a dog with osteosarcoma of the distal radius.

Authors:  Tamara L MacDonald; Teresa D Schiller
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 3.  Editorial: What is varus or valgus knee alignment?: a call for a uniform radiographic classification.

Authors:  Atul F Kamath; Craig Israelite; John Horneff; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anay Rajendra Patel; Brian Barlow; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

5.  Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

6.  Results of sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: an editorial comment on recently published in the Journal of Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

7.  The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Matthew P Abdel; David G Lewallen; Michael J Stuart; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Properties of open-cell porous metals and alloys for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Bone loss management in total knee revision surgery.

Authors:  Gabriele Panegrossi; Marco Ceretti; Matteo Papalia; Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A 30-mm cemented stem extension provides adequate fixation of the tibial component in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.