Literature DB >> 23886410

Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised?

David F Dalury1, Donald L Pomeroy, Robert S Gorab, Mary Jo Adams.   

Abstract

Despite technical improvements, revision rates for total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) remain high. Our goal was to report the reason(s) for revision TKA in a large, current, multicenter series and compare those reasons with previously published reasons. We retrospectively identified 820 consecutive revision TKAs (693 patients, 2000-2012) from our 3 centers and recorded the primary reason for the revision. The top seven reasons for the revision were aseptic loosening (23.1%), infection (18.4%), polyethylene wear (18.1%), instability (17.7%), pain/stiffness (9.3%), osteolysis (4.5%), and malposition/malalignment (2.9%). Comparison with previously published reasons showed fewer TKA revisions for polyethylene wear, osteolysis, instability, and malalignment. These changes may represent improvements in surgical technique and implants.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  current; diagnosis; knee arthroplasty; outcome;; revision total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23886410     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  59 in total

1.  The role of offset stems in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Giovanni Balato; Vincenzo Franceschini
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Mobility of the rotating platform in low contact stress knee arthroplasty is durable.

Authors:  Arthur Zürcher; Kim van Hutten; Jaap Harlaar; Ruud Pöll
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Using the anatomical tibial axis for total knee arthroplasty alignment may lead to an internal rotation error.

Authors:  Csaba Forster-Horvath; Valerie Kremo; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Andrej Maria Nowakowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Internal-external malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty increases tibial force imbalance but does not change laxities of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Jeremy Riley; Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Experimental testing of total knee replacements with UHMW-PE inserts: impact of severe wear test conditions.

Authors:  Carmen Zietz; Joern Reinders; Jens Schwiesau; Alexander Paulus; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Thomas Grupp; Sandra Utzschneider; Rainer Bader
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: the end of the allograft era?

Authors:  Sébastien Parratte; Matthew P Abdel; Alexandre Lunebourg; Nicolaas Budhiparama; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-10

8.  Revision knee complexity classification-RKCC: a common-sense guide for surgeons to support regional clinical networking in revision knee surgery.

Authors:  J R A Phillips; L Al-Mouazzen; R Morgan-Jones; J R Murray; A J Porteous; A D Toms
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The role of ligament tension and sensomotoric system in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Michael Tobias Hirschmann; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Distal tibial metaphyseal allograft cone for proximal tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty - A novel technique.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Vijay Kumar Jain; Deepak Gautam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.