Amy M Cao1, Guy D Eslick, Michael R Cox. 1. The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, New South Wales, 2751, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis remains an issue for debate amongst general surgeons. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The primary outcome measures included mortality rates, complication rates, length of hospital stay and conversion rates to open procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of electronic databases was performed for randomised controlled trials. Fifteen studies were included. RESULTS: Early surgery has a decreased risk of wound infections (RR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.35-0.93, p=0.01) compared with delayed surgery but no difference in mortality, bile duct injuries, bile duct leaks and the risk of conversion to open surgery. Of patients in the delayed group, 9.7 % failed initial non-operative management and underwent emergency LC. Early surgery had a significantly reduced total hospital stay and mean hospital costs compared with delayed surgery. CONCLUSION: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis demonstrated decreased incidence of wound infections, a shorter total length of stay and decreased costs with no difference in the rates of mortality, bile duct injuries, bile leaks and conversions. These results support that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best care and should be considered a routine in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.
INTRODUCTION: The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis remains an issue for debate amongst general surgeons. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The primary outcome measures included mortality rates, complication rates, length of hospital stay and conversion rates to open procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of electronic databases was performed for randomised controlled trials. Fifteen studies were included. RESULTS: Early surgery has a decreased risk of wound infections (RR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.35-0.93, p=0.01) compared with delayed surgery but no difference in mortality, bile duct injuries, bile duct leaks and the risk of conversion to open surgery. Of patients in the delayed group, 9.7 % failed initial non-operative management and underwent emergency LC. Early surgery had a significantly reduced total hospital stay and mean hospital costs compared with delayed surgery. CONCLUSION: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis demonstrated decreased incidence of wound infections, a shorter total length of stay and decreased costs with no difference in the rates of mortality, bile duct injuries, bile leaks and conversions. These results support that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best care and should be considered a routine in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.
Authors: Carsten N Gutt; Jens Encke; Jörg Köninger; Julian-Camill Harnoss; Kilian Weigand; Karl Kipfmüller; Oliver Schunter; Thorsten Götze; Markus T Golling; Markus Menges; Ernst Klar; Katharina Feilhauer; Wolfram G Zoller; Karsten Ridwelski; Sven Ackmann; Alexandra Baron; Michael R Schön; Helmut K Seitz; Dietmar Daniel; Wolfgang Stremmel; Markus W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michael R Cox; Lyn Cook; Jennifer Dobson; Paul Lambrakis; Shanthan Ganesh; Patrick Cregan Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: Constantine J. Karvellas; Victor Dong; Juan G. Abraldes; Erica L.W. Lester; Anand Kumar Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Brian M Moloney; Ronan M Waldron; Niamh O' Halloran; Michael E Kelly; Eddie Myers; Joseph T Garvin; Michael J Kerin; Chris G Collins Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Charlotte S Loozen; Maaike M Blessing; Bert van Ramshorst; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Djamila Boerma Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Charlotte S Loozen; Jelmer E Oor; Bert van Ramshorst; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Djamila Boerma Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Gabrielle E Hatton; Krislynn M Mueck; Isabel M Leal; Shuyan Wei; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 3.352