Literature DB >> 31134783

The impact of delayed source control and antimicrobial therapy in 196 patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock: a cohort analysis

Constantine J. Karvellas1, Victor Dong1, Juan G. Abraldes1, Erica L.W. Lester1, Anand Kumar1.   

Abstract

Background: Cholecystitis-associated septic shock carries a significant mortality. Our aim was to determine whether timing of source control affects survival in cholecystitis patients with septic shock.
Methods: We conducted a nested cohort study of all patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock from an international, multicentre database (1996–2015). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine associations between clinical factors and in-hospital mortality. The results were used to inform a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis that modelled the association between disease severity (APACHE II), time to source control and survival.
Results: Among 196 patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock, overall mortality was 37%. Compared with nonsurvivors (n = 72), survivors (n = 124) had lower mean admission APACHE II scores (21 v. 27, p < 0.001) and lower median admission serum lactate (2.4 v. 6.8 μmol/L, p < 0.001). Survivors were more likely to receive appropriate antimicrobial therapy earlier (median 2.8 v. 6.1 h from shock, p = 0.012). Survivors were also more likely to undergo successful source control earlier (median 9.8 v. 24.7 h from shock, p < 0.001). Adjusting for covariates, APACHE II (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.21 per increment) and delayed source control > 16 h (OR 4.45, 95% CI 1.88–10.70) were independently associated with increased mortality (all p < 0.001). The CART analysis showed that patients with APACHE II scores of 15–26 benefitted most from source control within 16 h (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: In patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock, admission APACHE II score and delay in source control (cholecystectomy or percutaneous cholecystostomy drainage) significantly affected hospital outcomes.
© 2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31134783      PMCID: PMC6738502          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.009418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  28 in total

1.  Pitfalls in estimating the effect of interventions in the critically ill using observational study designs.

Authors:  A F Connors
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-20

3.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Clifford S Deutschman; Ricard Ferrer; Ishaq Lat; Flavia R Machado; Greg S Martin; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Mark E Nunnally; Massimo Antonelli; Laura E Evans; Judith Hellman; Sameer Jog; Jozef Kesecioglu; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Early Cholecystectomy Is Superior to Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amy M Cao; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Nested case-control studies.

Authors:  V L Ernster
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Cholecystostomy offers no survival benefit in patients with acute acalculous cholecystitis and severe sepsis and shock.

Authors:  Jamie E Anderson; Tazo Inui; Mark A Talamini; David C Chang
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988.

Authors:  J S Garner; W R Jarvis; T G Emori; T C Horan; J M Hughes
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).

Authors:  Masamichi Yokoe; Tadahiro Takada; Steven M Strasberg; Joseph S Solomkin; Toshihiko Mayumi; Harumi Gomi; Henry A Pitt; O James Garden; Seiki Kiriyama; Jiro Hata; Toshifumi Gabata; Masahiro Yoshida; Fumihiko Miura; Kohji Okamoto; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Takao Itoi; Yuichi Yamashita; Christos Dervenis; Angus C W Chan; Wan-Yee Lau; Avinash N Supe; Giulio Belli; Serafin C Hilvano; Kui-Hin Liau; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sun-Whe Kim; Chen-Guo Ker
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.027

9.  Early Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis Offers the Best Outcomes at the Least Cost: A Model-Based Cost-Utility Analysis.

Authors:  Charles de Mestral; Jeffrey S Hoch; Andreas Laupacis; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Ori D Rotstein; Aziz S Alali; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Charles de Mestral; Ori D Rotstein; Andreas Laupacis; Jeffrey S Hoch; Brandon Zagorski; Aziz S Alali; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Basic point-of-care ultrasound framework based on the airway, breathing, and circulation approach for the initial management of shock and dyspnea.

Authors:  Toru Kameda; Akio Kimura
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2020-01-20

2.  Leukocyte kinetics during the early stage acts as a prognostic marker in patients with septic shock in intensive care unit.

Authors:  Qing Li; Jianfeng Xie; Yingzi Huang; Songqiao Liu; Fengmei Guo; Ling Liu; Yi Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.