Literature DB >> 19483447

A comparative study of early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

R P Yadav1, S Adhikary, C S Agrawal, B Bhattarai, R K Gupta, A Ghimire.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome in early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of frequency of intra operative and postoperative complications and to determine the rate and reasons for conversion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in the Department of Surgery at BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences from February 2003 to June 2004 in all patients with the diagnosis of acute calculus cholecystitis.
RESULTS: Out of 145 cases, 50 cases were included in our study where 12 (24%) patients were males and 38 (76%) were females (M:F=1:3.16). The mean (SD) age of patients in early and delayed groups were 42.68 yrs (14.18) and 40.26 yrs (11.62) respectively. The mean (SD) duration of symptoms in early successful and converted groups were 109.24 hrs (43.66) and 132 hrs (49.96) respectively and the mean (SD) duration of symptoms in delayed successful and converted groups were 15.36 months (13.88) and 41 months (40.73) respectively. In early group, 17 (68%) patients had total leukocyte count more than 10,000/cmm and they had ultrasound findings suggestive of acute cholecystitis. Out of 25 patients in early group, seven had jaundice and ten had deranged liver function in the preoperative period. In early group 4 (16%) patients; and in delayed group 3 (12%) had to be converted to open cholecystectomy (P=1.00). In early group 10 (40%) and in delayed 5 (20 %) cases had intraoperative complications (P=0.122). The total hospital stay was longer in the delayed group. The postoperative hospital stay in early and delayed converted groups were higher than early and delayed successful group (P=0.081, P=0.082).
CONCLUSION: Both early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy is possible and safe in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19483447     DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v7i1.1759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)        ISSN: 1812-2027


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy increases the total hospital stay compared to an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Benjamin Menahem; Andrea Mulliri; Audrey Fohlen; Lydia Guittet; Arnaud Alves; Jean Lubrano
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Yunxiao Cheng; Bin Wang; Sicong Zhao; Liang Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Surgical management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Rahul S Koti; Christopher J Davidson; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Early Cholecystectomy Is Superior to Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amy M Cao; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Delayed Presentation of Acute Cholecystitis: Comparative Outcomes of Same-Admission Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jarrod K H Tan; Joel C I Goh; Janice W L Lim; Iyer G Shridhar; Krishnakumar Madhavan; Alfred W C Kow
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Could the Tokyo guidelines on the management of acute cholecystitis be adopted in developing countries? Experience of one center.

Authors:  Mahdi Bouassida; Hédi Charrada; Bilel Feidi; Mohamed Fadhel Chtourou; Sélim Sassi; Mohamed Mongi Mighri; Fethi Chebbi; Hassen Touinsi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Comparison of clinical safety and outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min-Wei Zhou; Xiao-Dong Gu; Jian-Bin Xiang; Zong-You Chen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-14

Review 9.  Acute cholecystitis: WSES position statement.

Authors:  Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Pisano; Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set.

Authors:  Moira Cruickshank; Rumana Newlands; Jane Blazeby; Irfan Ahmed; Mohamed Bekheit; Miriam Brazzelli; Bernard Croal; Karen Innes; Craig Ramsay; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.