Literature DB >> 25736468

Bone-conduction hearing aids in an elderly population: complications and quality of life assessment.

Simon D Carr1, Javier Moraleda2, Alice Baldwin2, Jaydip Ray2.   

Abstract

To determine whether an elderly population with hearing impairment can be adequately rehabilitated with a bone-conduction hearing aid and whether the putative relationship between the elderly and an increased complication rate is justified. The study design was a retrospective case note review with a postal and telephone questionnaire, which was carried out in a tertiary centre. All patients aged 60 or over underwent implantation with a bone-conduction aid between 2009 and 2013 for conductive, SSD or mixed hearing loss. Outcome measures were complication rates and quality of life assessment using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. The influence of patient and surgical factors on the complication rate was assessed. Fifty-one patients were implanted. Mean age was 67 years (range 60-89 years). The mean benefit, satisfaction and global GBI scores were 70 % (range 0-100 %), 70 % (0-100 %) and 82 % (83-100 %), respectively. The residual disability was 18 % (0-25 %). The adverse skin reaction rate was 16 % and the fixture loss rate was 2 %. There was a demonstrable increase in the complication rate with the dermatome (45 %; 5 patients) compared to the Sheffield 'S' (13 %; 2 patients) or linear incision techniques (29 %; 7 patients). The bone-conduction hearing aids are ideal method of hearing rehabilitation in the elderly for all forms of hearing loss. It provides significant benefit with no increased complication rate, which is imperative if social isolation is to be avoided and cognition preserved in this growing elderly population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Correction of hearing impairment; Hearing aids; Mild cognitive impairment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25736468     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3574-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

1.  Benefit and quality of life in older bone-anchored hearing aid users.

Authors:  Maarten J F de Wolf; My-Linh C Shival; Myrthe K S Hol; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers; Ad F M Snik
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements.

Authors:  Myrthe K S Hol; Arjan J Bosman; Ad F M Snik; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Does this patient have hearing impairment?

Authors:  Akshay Bagai; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Christopher J Linstrom; Carol A Silverman; Guo-Pei Yu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in older adults: implant loss and skin reactions.

Authors:  Maarten J F de Wolf; Myrthe K S Hol; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Long-term results of 185 consecutive osseointegrated hearing device implantations: a comparison among children, adults, and elderly.

Authors:  Nadia Calvo Bodnia; Soren Foghsgaard; Martin Nue Møller; Per Cayé-Thomasen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Longer length Baha™ abutments decrease wound complications and revision surgery.

Authors:  Terah J Allis; Benjamin D Owen; Baojiang Chen; Dwight T Jones; Gary F Moore
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Long-term effectiveness of screening for hearing loss: the screening for auditory impairment--which hearing assessment test (SAI-WHAT) randomized trial.

Authors:  Bevan Yueh; Margaret P Collins; Pamela E Souza; Edward J Boyko; Carl F Loovis; Patrick J Heagerty; Chuan-Fen Liu; Susan C Hedrick
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Craig W Newman; Sharon A Sandridge; Lisa M Wodzisz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Auditory rehabilitation of older people from the general population--the Leiden 85-plus study.

Authors:  Jacobijn Gussekloo; L E de Bont; M von Faber; J A Eekhof; J A de Laat; J H Hulshof; E van Dongen; R G Westendorp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The impact of rehabilitation on quality of life after hearing loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arjuna Brodie; Bethany Smith; Jaydip Ray
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.