BACKGROUND: Very few older people with severe hearing loss use hearing aids to reduce the negative consequences of reduced hearing in daily functioning. AIM: Assessment of a screening test and a standardised auditory rehabilitation programme for older people from the general population with untreated severe hearing loss. DESIGN OF STUDY: Intervention study and qualitative exploration. SETTING: Leiden 85-Plus Study, a prospective population-based study of 85-year-old inhabitants of Leiden, the Netherlands. METHOD: Hearing loss was measured by pure-tone audiometry in 454 subjects aged 85 years. Subjects with hearing loss above 35 dB at 1, 2, and 4 kHz who did not use hearing aids were invited to participate in a standardised programme for auditory rehabilitation. In-depth interviews were held with participants to explore arguments for participating in this programme. RESULTS: Of the 367 participants with severe hearing loss (prevalence = 81%), 66% (241/367) did not use a hearing aid. Three out of four of these participants (n = 185) declined participation in the auditory rehabilitation programme. The most common reason given for not participating was the subjects' feeling that their current hearing loss did not warrant the use of a hearing aid. Subjects who participated in the programme were found to suffer from more severe hearing loss and experienced more hearing disability. Those who did not participate in the programme felt they could cope with their disabilities and considered a hearing aid unnecessary. CONCLUSION: Untreated hearing loss is prevalent among older people from the general population. The majority of older people decline auditory rehabilitation. For these people the use of a hearing aid is not perceived as necessary in order to function on a daily basis. Older people who have expected benefits from a hearing aid have already obtained them, marginalising the benefits of a rehabilitation (and screening) programme.
BACKGROUND: Very few older people with severe hearing loss use hearing aids to reduce the negative consequences of reduced hearing in daily functioning. AIM: Assessment of a screening test and a standardised auditory rehabilitation programme for older people from the general population with untreated severe hearing loss. DESIGN OF STUDY: Intervention study and qualitative exploration. SETTING: Leiden 85-Plus Study, a prospective population-based study of 85-year-old inhabitants of Leiden, the Netherlands. METHOD:Hearing loss was measured by pure-tone audiometry in 454 subjects aged 85 years. Subjects with hearing loss above 35 dB at 1, 2, and 4 kHz who did not use hearing aids were invited to participate in a standardised programme for auditory rehabilitation. In-depth interviews were held with participants to explore arguments for participating in this programme. RESULTS: Of the 367 participants with severe hearing loss (prevalence = 81%), 66% (241/367) did not use a hearing aid. Three out of four of these participants (n = 185) declined participation in the auditory rehabilitation programme. The most common reason given for not participating was the subjects' feeling that their current hearing loss did not warrant the use of a hearing aid. Subjects who participated in the programme were found to suffer from more severe hearing loss and experienced more hearing disability. Those who did not participate in the programme felt they could cope with their disabilities and considered a hearing aid unnecessary. CONCLUSION: Untreated hearing loss is prevalent among older people from the general population. The majority of older people decline auditory rehabilitation. For these people the use of a hearing aid is not perceived as necessary in order to function on a daily basis. Older people who have expected benefits from a hearing aid have already obtained them, marginalising the benefits of a rehabilitation (and screening) programme.
Authors: Liam Smeeth; Astrid E Fletcher; Edmond Siu-Woon Ng; Sue Stirling; Maria Nunes; Elizabeth Breeze; Christopher J Bulpitt; Dee Jones; Alistair Tulloch Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-04-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Terry L Wiley; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Ted S Tweed Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Hubert T Faber; Maarten J F de Wolf; Cor W R J Cremers; Ad F M Snik; Myrthe K S Hol Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2012-08-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Scott D Nash; Karen J Cruickshanks; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; F Javier Nieto; Theodore S Tweed Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Yvonne M Drewes; Julia M Koenen; Wouter de Ruijter; D J Annemarie van Dijk-van Dijk; Gerda M van der Weele; Barend J C Middelkoop; Ria Reis; Willem J J Assendelft; Jacobijn Gussekloo Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Danielle Schönborn; Faheema Mahomed Asmail; Karina C De Sousa; Ariane Laplante-Lévesque; David R Moore; Cas Smits; De Wet Swanepoel Journal: Am J Audiol Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 1.493