Literature DB >> 19708493

Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in older adults: implant loss and skin reactions.

Maarten J F de Wolf1, Myrthe K S Hol, Emmanuel A M Mylanus, Cor W R J Cremers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the clinical outcome measures of fixture loss and skin reactions in older-adult users of percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 224 older adults (at least 60 years of age) who underwent implantation of 248 implants with the simplified Nijmegen surgical technique between January 1995 and May 2007.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 39 months (range, 0 to 144 months), 16 of the 248 implants were lost (6.5%). The causes were failed osseointegration in 9 cases, trauma in 6 cases, and implant loss in irradiated bone in 1 case. There were no losses due to infection. Implant loss was not significantly correlated with age. In 40 implants (16.9%), severe skin reactions of Holgers grade 2 or more were observed. Skin revision surgery was performed around 6 implants (2.4%). None of the patients had an 8.5-mm abutment to overcome severe skin reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of BAHA surgery in older adults was favorable. The rate of implant loss was comparable with that in the overall population of BAHA recipients. There were low risks of severe skin reactions or developing thick skin around the implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19708493     DOI: 10.1177/000348940911800712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques.

Authors:  Shwan Mohamad; Imran Khan; S Y Hey; S S Musheer Hussain
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.

Authors:  E H H van der Stee; R M Strijbos; S J H Bom; M K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: surgical results.

Authors:  Jan Boucek; Jan Vokral; Libor Cerny; Martin Chovanec; Jiří Skrivan; Eduard Zverina; Jan Betka; Michal Zabrodsky
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Bone-conduction hearing aids in an elderly population: complications and quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Simon D Carr; Javier Moraleda; Alice Baldwin; Jaydip Ray
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Modified Baha Punch Technique: Least Invasive, Shortest Time and No Suturing.

Authors:  Hassan Alshehri; Abdulrahman Alsanosi; Osama Majdalawieh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-12

6.  Soft tissue reactions in patients with bone anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  J Rebol
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  The bonebridge as a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system: preliminary surgical and audiological results in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Stefan Bulla; Antje Aschendorff; Wolfgang Maier; Louisa Traser; Christian Steinmetz; Thomas Wesarg; Susan Arndt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Visualisation of the Bonebridge by means of CT and CBCT.

Authors:  Christian Güldner; Julia Heinrichs; Rainer Weiß; Annette Paula Zimmermann; Benjamin Dassinger; Siegfried Bien; Jochen Alfred Werner; Isabell Diogo
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.175

9.  Skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation.

Authors:  Gen-di Yin; Xiangli Zeng; Peng Li
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2016-02-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.