Literature DB >> 24114744

Longer length Baha™ abutments decrease wound complications and revision surgery.

Terah J Allis1, Benjamin D Owen, Baojiang Chen, Dwight T Jones, Gary F Moore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To study the complication rates of skin overgrowth, infection, and the need for revision surgery in longer length Baha™ abutments. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study compared with a retrospective historical control.
METHODS: After the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, data was collected from a prospective 8.5-mm abutment study group of 21 subjects with informed consent from October 2011 through October 2012, and was compared to a retrospective 5.5-mm abutment historical cohort of 23 patients who had undergone Baha™ by the same surgeon from May 2010 to October 2011. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and wound complications (skin overgrowth, infection, the need for revision surgery) were statistically investigated and compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients were studied. The groups were similar in smoking status, diabetes, and a female preponderance. The 8.5-mm abutment group was older (P = 0.012). The average BMI for both groups was classified as overweight and nearly obese (BMI 28.8). Rates of infection, skin overgrowth, and the need for revision surgery related to wound complications were significantly decreased in the longer 8.5-mm abutment group (P = 0.020, P = 0.012, P = 0.007, respectively). BMI did not correlate with decreased infection, skin overgrowth, and the need for revision surgery based on abutment length as hypothesized (P = 0.214, P = 0.206, P = 0.408).
CONCLUSIONS: The 8.5-mm abutment lends to decreased complications postoperatively, including infection, skin overgrowth, and the need for revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.
© 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Baha™; abutment; implants; revision surgery; scalp thickness; wound complications

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114744     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Bone-conduction hearing aids in an elderly population: complications and quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Simon D Carr; Javier Moraleda; Alice Baldwin; Jaydip Ray
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Predisposing factors for adverse skin reactions with percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices implanted with skin reduction techniques.

Authors:  Claudia Candreia; Ruth Birrer; Susanna Fistarol; Martin Kompis; Marco Caversaccio; Andreas Arnold; Christof Stieger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A Comparison of the Operative Techniques and the Postoperative Complications for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implantation.

Authors:  Mark W Steehler; Sean P Larner; Joshua S Mintz; Matthew K Steehler; Sidney P Lipman; Shane Griffith
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.