Literature DB >> 25122598

Long-term results of 185 consecutive osseointegrated hearing device implantations: a comparison among children, adults, and elderly.

Nadia Calvo Bodnia1, Soren Foghsgaard, Martin Nue Møller, Per Cayé-Thomasen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the occurrence and type of perioperative and postoperative complications in patients implanted with an osseointegrated hearing device (OHD) (also known as BAHA/BAHS) and compare results in children, adults, and elderly and for different surgical techniques. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case file review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients implanted with an OHD between 2004 and 2012, with more than 6 months of follow-up. INTERVENTION: OHD implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implant loss, adverse skin reactions (Holgers' score, ≥2), skin overgrowth, and discomfort resulting in abutment and/or implant removal.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five implantations in 176 patients were reviewed. Overall, 3.8% of the implants were lost spontaneously after a mean of 2.5 years. Implant loss in children was 18% versus 2.5% in adults and 3.8% in elderly. Adverse skin reactions occurred in 14% of observations overall; in 10% in children compared with 16% in adults and 9% in elderly. Partial or total skin overgrowth was seen in 4% and 6% of the observations in children and adults, respectively, whereas none of the elderly experienced this problem. The abutment was removed because of discomfort and/or no benefit in 10% overall, in 13% of adults, and in 6% of the elderly; none of the children opted for removal. Linear incision technique showed fewest complications.
CONCLUSION: OHD implantation is a procedure with few major complications. Adverse skin reaction is the most common complication. Children lose the implant more frequently than adults. Elderly patients have less adverse skin reactions/skin overgrowth. Discomfort leading to abutment removal is a concern especially among adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25122598     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  Switching from a percutaneous to a transcutaneous bone anchored hearing system: the utility of the fascia temporalis superficialis pedicled flap in case of skin intolerance.

Authors:  A Devèze; S Rossetto; R Meller; M Sanjuan Puchol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results.

Authors:  Dan Dupont Hougaard; Soren Kjaergaard Boldsen; Anne Marie Jensen; Soren Hansen; Per Cayé Thomassen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: surgical results.

Authors:  Jan Boucek; Jan Vokral; Libor Cerny; Martin Chovanec; Jiří Skrivan; Eduard Zverina; Jan Betka; Michal Zabrodsky
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Bone-conduction hearing aids in an elderly population: complications and quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Simon D Carr; Javier Moraleda; Alice Baldwin; Jaydip Ray
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Response to: Comment on "Original Solution for Middle Ear Implant and Anesthetic/Surgical Management in a Child with Severe Craniofacial Dysmorphism".

Authors:  Giovanni Bianchin; Lorenzo Tribi; Aronne Reverzani; Patrizia Formigoni; Valeria Polizzi
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-05

6.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Christine A den Besten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Steven J H Bom; Stefan Zwerver; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Laser-Modified Surface Enhances Osseointegration and Biomechanical Anchorage of Commercially Pure Titanium Implants for Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Martin L Johansson; Omar Omar; Hanna Simonsson; Anders Palmquist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Medical, Technical and Audiological Outcomes of Hearing Rehabilitation with the Bonebridge Transcutaneous Bone-Conduction Implant: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Faris F Brkic; Dominik Riss; Katharina Scheuba; Christoph Arnoldner; Wolfgang Gstöttner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Erich Vyskocil
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.