Literature DB >> 25733355

Development of a toxicogenomics signature for genotoxicity using a dose-optimization and informatics strategy in human cells.

Heng-Hong Li1,2, Daniel R Hyduke1,2,3, Renxiang Chen1,2, Pamela Heard4, Carole L Yauk5, Jiri Aubrecht4, Albert J Fornace1,2,6.   

Abstract

The development of in vitro molecular biomarkers to accurately predict toxicological effects has become a priority to advance testing strategies for human health risk assessment. The application of in vitro transcriptomic biomarkers promises increased throughput as well as a reduction in animal use. However, the existing protocols for predictive transcriptional signatures do not establish appropriate guidelines for dose selection or account for the fact that toxic agents may have pleiotropic effects. Therefore, comparison of transcriptome profiles across agents and studies has been difficult. Here we present a dataset of transcriptional profiles for TK6 cells exposed to a battery of well-characterized genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemicals. The experimental conditions applied a new dose optimization protocol that was based on evaluating expression changes in several well-characterized stress-response genes using quantitative real-time PCR in preliminary dose-finding studies. The subsequent microarray-based transcriptomic analyses at the optimized dose revealed responses to the test chemicals that were typically complex, often exhibiting substantial overlap in the transcriptional responses between a variety of the agents making analysis challenging. Using the nearest shrunken centroids method we identified a panel of 65 genes that could accurately classify toxicants as genotoxic or nongenotoxic. To validate the 65-gene panel as a genomic biomarker of genotoxicity, the gene expression profiles of an additional three well-characterized model agents were analyzed and a case study demonstrating the practical application of this genomic biomarker-based approach in risk assessment was performed to demonstrate its utility in genotoxicity risk assessment.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA-damage inducible; bioinformatics; stress genes; super-paramagnetic clustering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733355      PMCID: PMC4506269          DOI: 10.1002/em.21941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  41 in total

Review 1.  Voluntary exploratory data submissions to the US FDA and the EMA: experience and impact.

Authors:  Federico M Goodsaid; Shashi Amur; Jiri Aubrecht; Michael E Burczynski; Kevin Carl; Jennifer Catalano; Rosane Charlab; Sandra Close; Catherine Cornu-Artis; Laurent Essioux; Albert J Fornace; Lois Hinman; Huixiao Hong; Ian Hunt; David Jacobson-Kram; Ansar Jawaid; David Laurie; Lawrence Lesko; Heng-Hong Li; Klaus Lindpaintner; James Mayne; Peter Morrow; Marisa Papaluca-Amati; Timothy W Robison; John Roth; Ina Schuppe-Koistinen; Leming Shi; Olivia Spleiss; Weida Tong; Sharada L Truter; Jacky Vonderscher; Agnes Westelinck; Li Zhang; Issam Zineh
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Induction of bax by genotoxic stress in human cells correlates with normal p53 status and apoptosis.

Authors:  Q Zhan; S Fan; I Bae; C Guillouf; D A Liebermann; P M O'Connor; A J Fornace
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An information-intensive approach to the molecular pharmacology of cancer.

Authors:  J N Weinstein; T G Myers; P M O'Connor; S H Friend; A J Fornace; K W Kohn; T Fojo; S E Bates; L V Rubinstein; N L Anderson; J K Buolamwini; W W van Osdol; A P Monks; D A Scudiero; E A Sausville; D W Zaharevitz; B Bunow; V N Viswanadhan; G S Johnson; R E Wittes; K D Paull
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Salmonella mutagenicity tests: IV. Results from the testing of 300 chemicals.

Authors:  E Zeiger; B Anderson; S Haworth; T Lawlor; K Mortelmans
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Chinese hamster ovary cell assays for mutation and chromosome damage: data from non-carcinogens.

Authors:  Y Oshiro; C E Piper; P S Balwierz; S G Soelter
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.446

7.  Gene expression profiles and genetic damage in benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide-exposed TK6 cells.

Authors:  G S Akerman; B A Rosenzweig; O E Domon; L J McGarrity; L R Blankenship; C A Tsai; S J Culp; J T MacGregor; F D Sistare; J J Chen; S M Morris
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  DNA damage and DNA repair in cultured human cells exposed to chromate.

Authors:  R F Whiting; H F Stich; D J Koropatnick
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.192

9.  Integrating transcriptomics and metabonomics to unravel modes-of-action of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Danyel Jennen; Ainhoa Ruiz-Aracama; Christina Magkoufopoulou; Ad Peijnenburg; Arjen Lommen; Joost van Delft; Jos Kleinjans
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-31

10.  The utility of DNA microarrays for characterizing genotoxicity.

Authors:  Ronald K Newton; Marilyn Aardema; Jiri Aubrecht
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  27 in total

1.  Investigating the Generalizability of the MultiFlow ® DNA Damage Assay and Several Companion Machine Learning Models With a Set of 103 Diverse Test Chemicals.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Kristine L Witt; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  A cross-sector call to improve carcinogenicity risk assessment through use of genomic methodologies.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; Alison H Harrill; Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer; Jan Willem van der Laan; Jonathan Moggs; Roland Froetschl; Frank Sistare; Syril Pettit
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.

Authors:  Catrin Hasselgren; Ernst Ahlberg; Yumi Akahori; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Franck Atienzar; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Ewan D Booth; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Zoryana Cammerer; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Laura Custer; Krista Dobo; Tatyana Doktorova; David Faulkner; Kevin A Ford; Marie C Fortin; Markus Frericks; Samantha E Gad-McDonald; Nichola Gellatly; Helga Gerets; Véronique Gervais; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; James S Harvey; Jedd Hillegass; Masamitsu Honma; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Wen Hsu; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Candice Johnson; Robert Jolly; David Jones; Ray Kemper; Michelle O Kenyon; Naomi L Kruhlak; Sunil A Kulkarni; Klaus Kümmerer; Penny Leavitt; Scott Masten; Scott Miller; Chandrika Moudgal; Wolfgang Muster; Alexandre Paulino; Elena Lo Piparo; Mark Powley; Donald P Quigley; M Vijayaray Reddy; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Benoit Schilter; Ronald D Snyder; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Reinhard Stidl; David T Szabo; Andrew Teasdale; Raymond R Tice; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Anna Vuorinen; Brian A Wall; Pete Watts; Angela T White; Joerg Wichard; Kristine L Witt; Adam Woolley; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Interlaboratory evaluation of a multiplexed high information content in vitro genotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Jeffrey C Bemis; Richard A Spellman; Maria E Engel; Maik Schuler; Elisabeth Lorge; Pekka T Heikkinen; Ulrike Hemmann; Véronique Thybaud; Sabrina Wilde; Nina Queisser; Andreas Sutter; Andreas Zeller; Melanie Guérard; David Kirkland; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  GADD45 in Stress Signaling, Cell Cycle Control, and Apoptosis.

Authors:  Arslon Humayun; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

7.  CEBS update: curated toxicology database with enhanced tools for data integration.

Authors:  Cari Martini; Ying Frances Liu; Hui Gong; Nicole Sayers; German Segura; Jennifer Fostel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.

Authors:  Marc A Beal; Matthew Gagne; Sunil A Kulkarni; Grace Patlewicz; Russell S Thomas; Tara S Barton-Maclaren
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.043

9.  Considerations for Strategic Use of High-Throughput Transcriptomics Chemical Screening Data in Regulatory Decisions.

Authors:  Joshua Harrill; Imran Shah; R Woodrow Setzer; Derik Haggard; Scott Auerbach; Richard Judson; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2019

10.  Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.