Literature DB >> 25732095

Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning.

Rebecca Lewthwaite1,2, Suzete Chiviacowsky3, Ricardo Drews3, Gabriele Wulf4.   

Abstract

Numerous studies in the motor learning domain have demonstrated learning advantages of self-controlled practice relative to yoked conditions. In separate lines of evidence in the social-psychological literature, findings show that providing participants with task-relevant autonomy support or minor incidental choices can result in superior outcomes when compared with conditions that thwart autonomy or do not offer choice. We hypothesized that motor learning could be enhanced by providing learners with choices - even if those choices are unrelated to task performance. In Experiment 1, two groups of participants practiced a golf putting task. While one group (the choice group) was able to select the color of golf balls (white, yellow, or orange) to be used in each upcoming block of 10 trials, participants in the second group (the yoked group) were provided with the same colored golf balls their choice-group counterparts had chosen. The results of a 24-h delayed retention test indicated significantly greater putting accuracy for the choice compared with the yoked group. Experiment 2 went one step further by asking choice group participants for their preferences regarding two issues unrelated to the practice task (balancing on a stabilometer): (1) which of two subsequent tasks (coincident timing or hand dynamometry) they wanted to perform and (2) which of two prints of paintings by Renoir they thought the investigator should hang on the laboratory wall. Yoked group participants were simply informed about which task they would perform afterwards and of which painting the experimenter would put on the wall. Balance learning was significantly more effective in the choice group on a retention test. Thus, self-controlled practice conditions can influence motor learning without providing task-relevant information, content, or strategic learning advantages. Self-controlled effects in motor learning may be motivational in nature, attributable to satisfaction of fundamental autonomy needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balance learning; Choice; Fundamental psychological needs; Golf putting; Self-controlled practice

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732095     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0814-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  32 in total

1.  Self-controlled amount of practice benefits learning of a motor skill.

Authors:  Phillip G Post; Jeffrey T Fairbrother; Joao A C Barros
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Small choices can enhance balance learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Nicole Adams
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 3.  Hippocampus and striatum: dynamics and interaction during acquisition and sleep-related motor sequence memory consolidation.

Authors:  Geneviève Albouy; Bradley R King; Pierre Maquet; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning.

Authors:  Andrew Hooyman; Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 5.  Self-regulation of sport performance.

Authors:  D S Kirschenbaum
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Suzete Chiviacowsky; Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Tiago Campos
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains.

Authors:  Mitsunari Abe; Heidi Schambra; Eric M Wassermann; Dave Luckenbaugh; Nicolas Schweighofer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Keep your fingers crossed!: how superstition improves performance.

Authors:  Lysann Damisch; Barbara Stoberock; Thomas Mussweiler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-05-28

9.  From creation to consolidation: a novel framework for memory processing.

Authors:  Edwin M Robertson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Agency modulates the lateral and medial prefrontal cortex responses in belief-based decision making.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qinghua He; Zhong-Lin Lu; Irwin P Levin; Qi Dong; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Choices enhance punching performance of competitive kickboxers.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Dale W Chapman; David T Martin; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Gabriele Wulf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-07-27

4.  An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 5.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of choice on intentional and incidental memory.

Authors:  Zhuolei Ding; Ting Jiang; Chuansheng Chen; Vishnu P Murty; Jingming Xue; Mingxia Zhang
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Relatedness support enhances motor learning.

Authors:  Daniela H Gonzalez; Suzete Chiviacowsky
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-10

8.  Learning Gait Modifications for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: Applying Motor Learning Principles to Improve Research and Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Jesse M Charlton; Janice J Eng; Linda C Li; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-02-04

9.  Self-Control of Haptic Assistance for Motor Learning: Influences of Frequency and Opinion of Utility.

Authors:  Camille K Williams; Victrine Tseung; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-04

10.  High User Control in Game Design Elements Increases Compliance and In-game Performance in a Memory Training Game.

Authors:  Aniket Nagle; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.