Literature DB >> 27942953

Relatedness support enhances motor learning.

Daniela H Gonzalez1, Suzete Chiviacowsky2.   

Abstract

The present experiment was designed to test the effects of practice with relatedness support on motor learning. Forty-five young adults practiced a task in which they were required to learn to swim the front crawl stroke for one length in an indoor swimming pool (25 m) using 50% of the maximal speed. In the relatedness support condition (RS group), the instructions emphasized acknowledgement, caring, and interest in the participants' experiences, while in the relatedness thwart condition (RTh group), instructions emphasized disinterest in the participant as a person. A third, neutral condition (Control group) did not receive specific relatedness instructions. One day after practice, participants completed retention and transfer tests. The RS group demonstrated greater improvement in performance during practice and enhanced learning relative to the RTh and Control groups, while the RTh group showed decreased learning compared with the Control group. Furthermore, RS participants reported higher motivation and greater positive affect than the RTh and Control groups. The present findings demonstrate that relatedness support enhances the learning of motor skills. They also highlight motivational and affective effects that are observed when learners are provided with relatedness support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27942953     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0833-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  55 in total

1.  Does self-efficacy mediate transfer effects in the learning of easy and difficult motor skills?

Authors:  David Stevens; David I Anderson; Nicholas J O'Dwyer; A Mark Williams
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-04-21

2.  Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals.

Authors:  Jae T Patterson; Michael Carter
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 3.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

4.  Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning.

Authors:  Andrew Hooyman; Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 5.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Infant--mother attachment.

Authors:  M D Ainsworth
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1979-10

7.  Self-control behaviors during the learning of a cascade juggling task.

Authors:  David D Laughlin; Jeffrey T Fairbrother; Craig A Wrisberg; Arya Alami; Leslee A Fisher; Schuyler W Huck
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot.

Authors:  Christopher Adam Aiken; Jeffrey T Fairbrother; Phillip Guy Post
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-11

9.  Grand challenge for movement science and sport psychology: embracing the social-cognitive-affective-motor nature of motor behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca Lewthwaite; Gabriele Wulf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-08-23

10.  Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Fairbrother; David D Laughlin; Timothy V Nguyen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.