Literature DB >> 25725790

Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasound: classification and correlation with histology.

Zhi Li Wang1, Nan Li2, Min Li2, Wen Bo Wan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Owing to advances in ultrasound (US) technology, optimal US techniques with a high-frequency transducer can identify more and more breast lesions. However, some lesions show up as non-mass-like lesions, which are difficult to be correctly identified and often result in missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. The purpose of the present study was to develop a classification of the US features of non-mass-like breast lesions correlated with pathology, so as to improve the diagnostic accuracy of US in non-mass-like breast lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 854 breast lesions in 836 consecutive women scheduled for US-guided core-needle biopsy or US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy between May 2008 and October 2011 were initially included in this study. Finally, 80 breast lesions in 78 women were classified as non-mass-like lesion and included in this study. The US features of the 80 non-mass-like breast lesions were classified and their correlation with pathology was analysed.
RESULTS: Of the 80 non-mass-like breast lesions, 43 cases (53.8 %) were malignant and 37 cases (46.2 %) were benign. Fifty-two cases (73.7 %) appeared as a hypoechoic area, 22 cases (21.1 %) appeared as a hypoechoic area with sporadic or clustered microcalcification, four cases appeared as architectural distortion, and two cases appeared as solid echogenicity within a duct. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of US for non-mass-like breast lesions were 71.25, 95.35, 43.24, 66.13 and 88.89 %, respectively. The finding of a hypoechoic area with microcalcification showed a statistically significant association with malignant lesions and its positive predictive value for carcinoma was 78.26 %.
CONCLUSION: Non-mass-like breast lesions usually appeared as a hypoechoic area or a hypoechoic area with microcalcification. The finding of a hypoechoic area with microcalcification had a close correlation with malignant lesions. US had a high sensitivity but a low specificity in the diagnosis of non-mass-like breast lesions and a definitive diagnosis requires a US-guided biopsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microcalcification; Non-mass-like breast lesions; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725790     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-014-0493-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  13 in total

Review 1.  Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasonography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.

Authors:  Nouf Abdullah; Benoît Mesurolle; Mona El-Khoury; Ellen Kao
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Yeon Ju Gwak; Hye Jung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Sang Kwon Lee; Kyung Min Shin; Hui Joong Lee; Gab Chul Kim; Yun-Jin Jang; Man Hoon Han; Ji Young Park; Jin Hyang Jung
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 4.  Breast microcalcifications as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10665 cases with special focus on round/punctate microcalcifications.

Authors:  M Rominger; C Wisgickl; N Timmesfeld
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2012-08-24

5.  Ultrasound (US) diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer.

Authors:  Eriko Tohno; Ei Ueno
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.239

6.  Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamada; Naoko Mori; Mika Watanabe; Izo Kimijima; Tadayuki Okumoto; Kazumasa Seiji; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  US of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Jae Sung Myung; Yu Jin Lee; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Jung-Gi Im
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  The role of contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of non-mass image-forming lesions on breast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Keiichi Sotome; Yuki Yamamoto; Atsushi Hirano; Takeshi Takahara; Sayuri Hasegawa; Makoto Nakamaru; Akio Furukawa; Hiroshi Miyazaki; Kyoei Morozumi; Tatsuya Onishi; Yoichi Tanaka; Hisami Iri
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.239

9.  Two cases of primary small cell carcinoma of the breast showing non-mass-like pattern on diagnostic imaging and histopathology.

Authors:  Maki Amano; Kanako Ogura; Yutaka Ozaki; Mitsukuni Tamai; Toshiaki Kitabatake; Minoru Fujisawa; Kuniaki Kojima
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.239

10.  Can mammographic findings help discriminate between atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ after needle core biopsy?

Authors:  Jenny K Hoang; Prue Hill; Jennifer N Cawson
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  11 in total

1.  Additional diagnostic value of shear-wave elastography and color Doppler US for evaluation of breast non-mass lesions detected at B-mode US.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Jung Hee Shin; Ga Ram Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: factors associated with false negative and false positive results.

Authors:  So Yoon Park; Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The usefulness of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for improving the performance of clinicians to diagnose non-mass lesions on breast ultrasonographic images.

Authors:  Mai Shibusawa; Ryohei Nakayama; Yuko Okanami; Yumi Kashikura; Nao Imai; Takashi Nakamura; Hiroko Kimura; Masako Yamashita; Noriko Hanamura; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Can shear wave elastography be utilized as an additional tool for the assessment of non-mass breast lesions?

Authors:  Sepideh Sefidbakht; Sara Haseli; Neda Khalili; Vahid Bazojoo; Pedram Keshavarz; Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-03-17

5.  Ultrasonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 219 lesions.

Authors:  Jun Kang Li; Huan Fan Wang; Yan He; Yong Huang; Gang Liu; Zhi Li Wang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-12

6.  Evaluation of internal and shell stiffness in the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions by shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Mei Wu; Min Yang; Juan Xiao; Zheng-Min Ruan; Lan-Ying Wu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Histopathology and elastography discordance in evaluation of breast lesions with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Nurşen Toprak; Adem Yokus; Mahir Gündüz; Huseyın Akdenız
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-26

8.  Automated Breast Ultrasound: Interobserver Agreement, Diagnostic Value, and Associated Clinical Factors of Coronal-Plane Image Features.

Authors:  Guoxue Tang; Xin An; Huiling Xiang; Lixian Liu; Anhua Li; Xi Lin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Lifang Jin; Gang Li; Chao Jia; Qiusheng Shi; Lianfang Du; Rong Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Breast non-mass-like lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Feature analysis, breast image reporting and data system classification assessment.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Min Yang; Yong Liu; Yan-Ping Li; Hong Zhang; Guang-Rui Shao
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.