Literature DB >> 21498298

Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.

Yeon Ju Gwak1, Hye Jung Kim, Jin Young Kwak, Sang Kwon Lee, Kyung Min Shin, Hui Joong Lee, Gab Chul Kim, Yun-Jin Jang, Man Hoon Han, Ji Young Park, Jin Hyang Jung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is asymptomatic and usually manifests as calcifications in screening mammography. On the other hand, little is known about ultrasonographic (US) features of asymptomatic DCIS, for US is rarely used for the diagnosis and evaluation of DCIS because of low sensitivity in detecting microcalcifications.
PURPOSE: To evaluate US detection and characterization of DCIS in asymptomatic women and correlate these imaging findings with the histopathologic features.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated mammographic and US images of 60 DCIS cases from 59 asymptomatic women. US was performed in knowledge of mammographic findings. The following histopathologic parameters were analyzed: Van Nuys classification, architectural pattern, and presence of microinvasion. Image detectability and US features were correlated with these histopathologic parameters.
RESULTS: Of the 54 cases (90.0%) detected on mammography, 48 cases (88.9%) had microcalcifications only, 5 (9.3%) had microcalcifications with associated density, and 1 (1.9%) had soft tissue density alone. Of the 38 cases (63.3%) identified by US, 29 cases (76.3%) had a mass with or without microcalcifications, six (15.8%) had microcalcifications only, and three (7.9%) had other findings. US identified lesions were associated with higher Van Nuys groups, microinvasion and comedocarcinoma (P = 0.044, P = 0.024, and P = 0.032, respectively). The most common US finding was a not-circumscribed, oval mass with parallel orientation and normal acoustic transmission. Microcalcifications were seen on US in 31 (81.6%) of the 38 US visible cases; this finding showed a trend of association with Van Nuys group 2 and 3 but was not statistically significant (P = 0.063).
CONCLUSION: When DCIS was identified on US, it was associated with more aggressive histopathologic type. However, mammographic correlation is essential to differentiate benign from malignant lesion in cases seen by US; US findings of asymptomatic DCIS had a low suspicion of malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21498298     DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.100391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  Potential role of shear-wave ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: preliminary report.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung; So Joong Kim; Hyerin Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasound: classification and correlation with histology.

Authors:  Zhi Li Wang; Nan Li; Min Li; Wen Bo Wan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Imaging features that distinguish pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from DCIS with microinvasion.

Authors:  Hongli Wang; Jinjiang Lin; Jianguo Lai; Cui Tan; Yaping Yang; Ran Gu; Xiaofang Jiang; Fengtao Liu; Yue Hu; Fengxi Su
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-03

4.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Mohammed Badruddoja
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-09-04

5.  Ultrasonographic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlations with pathologic features and biological markers.

Authors:  Hwajin Cha; Yun-Woo Chang; Eun Ji Lee; Ji Young Hwang; Hyun Joo Kim; Eun Hye Lee; Jung Kyu Ryu
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-10-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.