Literature DB >> 20833844

Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Takayuki Yamada1, Naoko Mori, Mika Watanabe, Izo Kimijima, Tadayuki Okumoto, Kazumasa Seiji, Shoki Takahashi.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 20%-25% of breast cancers detected at screening mammography. The lesions are diverse and commonly are classified on the basis of their mammographic features and histologic characteristics such as nuclear grade and presence or absence of necrosis. The most common mammographic finding in DCIS is microcalcifications, but a low-grade lesion without necrosis is less likely to manifest with calcifications than either an intermediate- or a high-grade lesion. Other mammographic findings might include a mass or architectural distortion. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has higher sensitivity than mammography for the detection of DCIS and greater accuracy for depicting the extent of disease. The MR imaging appearance of DCIS depends primarily on the presence and extent of abnormal periductal or stromal vascularity. Nonmasslike enhancement, the most common MR imaging finding, is often seen in association with clumped internal enhancement. The enhancement kinetics in dynamic MR studies vary, and no kinetic pattern is pathognomonic of a particular nuclear grade of DCIS. However, the kinetic pattern at delayed imaging does appear to be correlated with the mammographic findings: Mass lesions show strong washout; fine pleomorphic, fine linear, and fine linear-branching calcifications demonstrate a plateau enhancement pattern; and amorphous calcifications exhibit persistent enhancement. Multidetector computed tomography might be a useful adjunct to MR imaging for preoperative mapping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20833844     DOI: 10.1148/rg.305095073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  23 in total

1.  Quantitative breast MRI: 2D histogram analysis of diffusion tensor parameters in normal tissue.

Authors:  Julia Wiederer; Shila Pazahr; Cornelia Leo; Daniel Nanz; Andreas Boss
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Authors:  B L Stehouwer; L G Merckel; H M Verkooijen; N H G M Peters; R M Mann; K M Duvivier; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; W B Veldhuis; M A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Does patient age affect the PPV3 of ACR BI-RADS Ultrasound categories 4 and 5 in the diagnostic setting?

Authors:  Yue Hu; Yaping Yang; Ran Gu; Liang Jin; Shiyu Shen; Fengtao Liu; Hongli Wang; Jingsi Mei; Xiaofang Jiang; Qiang Liu; Fengxi Su
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasound: classification and correlation with histology.

Authors:  Zhi Li Wang; Nan Li; Min Li; Wen Bo Wan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution.

Authors:  Gustavo Machado Badan; Decio Roveda Júnior; Sebastião Piato; Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury; Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos; Carlos Alberto Ferreira Pecci; Felipe Augusto Trocoli Ferreira; Camila D'Ávila
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

6.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Quantitative Preoperative Breast MR Imaging Features Associated with Recurrence after Treatment.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Brian S Johnston; Averi E Kitsch; Daniel S Hippe; Larissa A Korde; Sara Javid; Janie M Lee; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Breast Microcalcifications as the Only Imaging Manifestation of Metastatic Serous Peritoneal Adenocarcinoma in the Breast.

Authors:  Mary Moon-Sun Liang; Sze Yiun Teo; Mihir Gudi; Swee Ho Lim; Thida Win
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-31

Review 8.  Advances in Breast MRI in the Setting of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Diana L Lam; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 0.800

9.  Does background parenchymal enhancement on MRI affect the rate of positive resection margin in breast cancer patients?

Authors:  S Y Park; D K Kang; T H Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Clinics in diagnostic imaging (180). Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Eu Jin Tan; Tammy Hui Lin Moey; Preetha Madhukumar; Lester Chee Hao Leong
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.