So Yoon Park1, Ji Soo Choi2, Boo-Kyung Han1, Eun Young Ko1, Eun Sook Ko1. 1. Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea. jisoo.choi@samsung.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors related to false shear wave elastography (SWE) results for breast non-mass lesions (NMLs) detected by B-mode US. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 152 NMLs detected by B-mode US and later pathologically confirmed (79 malignant, 73 benign). All lesions underwent B-mode US and SWE. Quantitative (mean elasticity [E mean]) and qualitative (maximum stiffness colour) SWE parameters were assessed, and 'E mean > 85.1 kPa' or 'stiff colour (green to red)' determined malignancy. Final SWE results were matched to pathology results. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with false SWE results for diagnosis of breast NMLs. RESULTS: Associated calcifications (E mean: odds ratio [OR] = 7.60, P < 0.01; maximum stiffness colour: OR = 6.30, P = 0.02), in situ cancer compared to invasive cancer (maximum stiffness colour: OR = 5.29, P = 0.02), and lesion size (E mean: OR = 0.90, P < 0.01; maximum stiffness colour: OR = 0.91, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with false negative SWE results for malignant NMLs. Distance from the nipple (E mean: OR = 0.84, P = 0.03; maximum stiffness colour: OR = 0.93, P = 0.04) was significantly associated with false positive SWE results for benign NMLs. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of associated calcifications, absence of the invasive component, and smaller lesion size for malignant NMLs and shorter distance from the nipple for benign NMLs are factors significantly associated with false SWE results. KEY POINTS: • Calcification and size are associated with false negative SWE in malignant NMLs. • In situ cancer is associated with false negative SWE in malignant NMLs. • Distance from the nipple is associated with false positive SWE in benign NMLs. • These factors need consideration when performing SWE on breast NMLs.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors related to false shear wave elastography (SWE) results for breast non-mass lesions (NMLs) detected by B-mode US. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 152 NMLs detected by B-mode US and later pathologically confirmed (79 malignant, 73 benign). All lesions underwent B-mode US and SWE. Quantitative (mean elasticity [E mean]) and qualitative (maximum stiffness colour) SWE parameters were assessed, and 'E mean > 85.1 kPa' or 'stiff colour (green to red)' determined malignancy. Final SWE results were matched to pathology results. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with false SWE results for diagnosis of breast NMLs. RESULTS: Associated calcifications (E mean: odds ratio [OR] = 7.60, P < 0.01; maximum stiffness colour: OR = 6.30, P = 0.02), in situ cancer compared to invasive cancer (maximum stiffness colour: OR = 5.29, P = 0.02), and lesion size (E mean: OR = 0.90, P < 0.01; maximum stiffness colour: OR = 0.91, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with false negative SWE results for malignant NMLs. Distance from the nipple (E mean: OR = 0.84, P = 0.03; maximum stiffness colour: OR = 0.93, P = 0.04) was significantly associated with false positive SWE results for benign NMLs. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of associated calcifications, absence of the invasive component, and smaller lesion size for malignant NMLs and shorter distance from the nipple for benign NMLs are factors significantly associated with false SWE results. KEY POINTS: • Calcification and size are associated with false negative SWE in malignant NMLs. • In situ cancer is associated with false negative SWE in malignant NMLs. • Distance from the nipple is associated with false positive SWE in benign NMLs. • These factors need consideration when performing SWE on breast NMLs.
Authors: Wendie A Berg; David O Cosgrove; Caroline J Doré; Fritz K W Schäfer; William E Svensson; Regina J Hooley; Ralf Ohlinger; Ellen B Mendelson; Catherine Balu-Maestro; Martina Locatelli; Christophe Tourasse; Barbara C Cavanaugh; Valérie Juhan; A Thomas Stavros; Anne Tardivon; Joel Gay; Jean-Pierre Henry; Claude Cohen-Bacrie Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hee Jung Shin; Hak Hee Kim; Sun Mi Kim; Gui Young Kwon; Gyungyub Gong; On Koo Cho Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: C Balleyguier; L Ciolovan; S Ammari; S Canale; S Sethom; R Al Rouhbane; P Vielh; C Dromain Journal: Diagn Interv Imaging Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 4.026
Authors: Jung Min Chang; In Ae Park; Su Hyun Lee; Won Hwa Kim; Min Sun Bae; Hye Ryoung Koo; Ann Yi; Seung Ja Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Xiao Luo PhD; Min Xu; Guoxue Tang; Yi Wang PhD; Na Wang; Dong Ni PhD; Xi Lin PhD; An-Hua Li Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 3.039