Literature DB >> 11896217

US of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Woo Kyung Moon1, Jae Sung Myung, Yu Jin Lee, In Ae Park, Dong-Young Noh, Jung-Gi Im.   

Abstract

Little is known about the ultrasonographic (US) features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast because this entity usually manifests as pure mammographic calcifications and is rarely evaluated with US. US findings were recorded in 70 patients with DCIS and then analyzed and correlated with mammographic and histologic findings. A microlobulated mass with mild hypoechogenicity, ductal extension, and normal acoustic transmission was the most common US finding in DCIS. Spiculated margins, marked hypoechogenicity, a thick echogenic rim, and posterior acoustic shadowing at US often suggested the presence of invasion. US performed with a 10-13-MHz transducer and optimal technique can be used as a complement to mammography in detecting and evaluating DCIS of the breast, as it demonstrates breast lesions associated with malignant microcalcifications in most cases. The main benefit of identifying a US abnormality in women with mammographically detected DCIS is to allow the use of US to guide interventional procedures (eg, needle biopsy, needle localization). US may also be helpful in detecting DCIS without calcifications and in evaluating disease extent in women with dense breasts. Nevertheless, further research is needed to delineate the role of US in the evaluation of patients with DCIS. Copyright RSNA, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11896217     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.22.2.g02mr16269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  24 in total

1.  Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

Authors:  V Londero; C Zuiani; A Furlan; J Nori; M Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Potential role of shear-wave ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: preliminary report.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung; So Joong Kim; Hyerin Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Breast US in patients with breast cancer presenting as only microcalcifications on mammography: can US differentiate ductal carcinoma in situ from invasive cancer?

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Han; Jin Hwa Lee; Eun-Kyung Kim; Suyoung Shin; Myong Jin Kang; Keun-Cheol Lee; Kyung Jin Nam
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Jung Min Chang; Ann Yi; Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong-Seon Park; In Ae Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasound: classification and correlation with histology.

Authors:  Zhi Li Wang; Nan Li; Min Li; Wen Bo Wan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography.

Authors:  Zhi Li Wang; Jian Hong Xu; Jian Hong Xw; Jun Lai Li; Yan Huang; Jie Tang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Prediction of invasive breast cancer using shear-wave elastography in patients with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jae Seok Bae; Jung Min Chang; Su Hyun Lee; Sung Ui Shin; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Clinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Gaiane M Rauch; Henry M Kuerer; Marion E Scoggins; Patricia S Fox; Ana P Benveniste; Young Mi Park; Sara A Lari; Brian P Hobbs; Beatriz E Adrada; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone.

Authors:  Ayumi Izumori; Koji Takebe; Akira Sato
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.