Literature DB >> 25717168

Inhibition during response preparation is sensitive to response complexity.

Ian Greenhouse1, Dylan Saks2, Timothy Hoang2, Richard B Ivry2.   

Abstract

Motor system excitability is transiently suppressed during the preparation of movement. This preparatory inhibition is hypothesized to facilitate response selection and initiation. Given that demands on selection and initiation processes increase with movement complexity, we hypothesized that complexity would influence preparatory inhibition. To test this hypothesis, we probed corticospinal excitability during a delayed-response task in which participants were cued to prepare right- or left-hand movements of varying complexity. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied over right primary motor cortex to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) of the left hand. MEP suppression was greater during the preparation of responses involving coordination of the FDI and adductor digiti minimi relative to easier responses involving only the FDI, independent of which hand was cued to respond. In contrast, this increased inhibition was absent when the complex responses required sequential movements of the two muscles. Moreover, complexity did not influence the level of inhibition when the response hand was fixed for the trial block, regardless of whether the complex responses were performed simultaneously or sequentially. These results suggest that preparatory inhibition contributes to response selection, possibly by suppressing extraneous movements when responses involve the simultaneous coordination of multiple effectors.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; inhibition; motor control; response complexity; response preparation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25717168      PMCID: PMC4416613          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00999.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring.

Authors:  W J Gehring; R T Knight
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions.

Authors:  Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

Authors:  M M Botvinick; T S Braver; D M Barch; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to interhemispheric interactions.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Siobhan Hutchinson; Gottfried Schlaug; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Transitions between dynamical states of differing stability in the human brain.

Authors:  Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Ulf Ziemann; Goran Hajak; Leonardo Cohen; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control.

Authors:  K Richard Ridderinkhof; Markus Ullsperger; Eveline A Crone; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Dalley; Barry J Everitt; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Both primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area play an important role in complex finger movement.

Authors:  H Shibasaki; N Sadato; H Lyshkow; Y Yonekura; M Honda; T Nagamine; S Suwazono; Y Magata; A Ikeda; M Miyazaki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements.

Authors:  S M Rao; J R Binder; P A Bandettini; T A Hammeke; F Z Yetkin; A Jesmanowicz; L M Lisk; G L Morris; W M Mueller; L D Estkowski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Excitability of the motor cortex ipsilateral to the moving body side depends on spatio-temporal task complexity and hemispheric specialization.

Authors:  Femke E van den Berg; Stephan P Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Individual Differences in Resting Corticospinal Excitability Are Correlated with Reaction Time and GABA Content in Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Maedbh King; Sean Noah; Richard J Maddock; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  The Neural Specificity of Movement Preparation During Actual and Imagined Movements.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Célia Ruffino; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Planning face, hand, and leg movements: anatomical constraints on preparatory inhibition.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Claudia Tischler; Christian Cazares; Ian Greenhouse; Julie Duque; Florent Lebon; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Deficient inhibition in alcohol-dependence: let's consider the role of the motor system!

Authors:  Caroline Quoilin; Emmanuelle Wilhelm; Pierre Maurage; Philippe de Timary; Julie Duque
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  A Double-Coil TMS Method to Assess Corticospinal Excitability Changes at a Near-Simultaneous Time in the Two Hands during Movement Preparation.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Wilhelm; Caroline Quoilin; Charlotte Petitjean; Julie Duque
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Nonspecific Inhibition of the Motor System during Response Preparation.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Ana Sias; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance.

Authors:  Mario Paci; Giulio Di Cosmo; Mauro Gianni Perrucci; Francesca Ferri; Marcello Costantini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison of Motor Inhibition in Variants of the Instructed-Delay Choice Reaction Time Task.

Authors:  Caroline Quoilin; Julien Lambert; Benvenuto Jacob; Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Julie Duque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.