Literature DB >> 29309536

The Neural Specificity of Movement Preparation During Actual and Imagined Movements.

Florent Lebon1, Célia Ruffino1, Ian Greenhouse2,3, Ludovica Labruna2,3, Richard B Ivry2,3, Charalambos Papaxanthis1.   

Abstract

Current theories consider motor imagery, the mental representation of action, to have considerable functional overlap with the processes involved in actual movement preparation and execution. To test the neural specificity of motor imagery, we conducted a series of 3 experiments using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We compared changes in corticospinal excitability as people prepared and implemented actual or imagined movements, using a delayed response task in which a cue indicated the forthcoming response. TMS pulses, used to elicit motor-evoked responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand, were applied before and after an imperative signal, allowing us to probe the state of excitability during movement preparation and implementation. Similar to previous work, excitability increased in the agonist muscle during the implementation of an actual or imagined movement. Interestingly, preparing an imagined movement engaged similar inhibitory processes as that observed during actual movement, although the degree of inhibition was less selective in the imagery conditions. These changes in corticospinal excitability were specific to actual/imagined movement preparation, as no modulation was observed when preparing and generating images of cued visual objects. Taken together, inhibition is a signature of how actions are prepared, whether they are imagined or actually executed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29309536      PMCID: PMC7199888          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  43 in total

1.  Functional properties of primate spinal interneurones during voluntary hand movements.

Authors:  Eberhard E Fetz; Steve I Perlmutter; Yifat Prut; Kazuhiko Seki
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Motor learning without doing: trial-by-trial improvement in motor performance during mental training.

Authors:  Rodolphe Gentili; Cheol E Han; Nicolas Schweighofer; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  On the equivalence of executed and imagined movements: evidence from lateralized motor and nonmotor potentials.

Authors:  Cornelia Kranczioch; Simon Mathews; Phil J A Dean; Annette Sterr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Movement-related potentials associated with movement preparation and motor imagery.

Authors:  R Cunnington; R Iansek; J L Bradshaw; J G Phillips
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Laterality effects in motor learning by mental practice in right-handers.

Authors:  R J Gentili; C Papaxanthis
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Inhibition during response preparation is sensitive to response complexity.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Dylan Saks; Timothy Hoang; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Neural plasticity during motor learning with motor imagery practice: Review and perspectives.

Authors:  Célia Ruffino; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Florent Lebon
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Cortical activity in the null space: permitting preparation without movement.

Authors:  Matthew T Kaufman; Mark M Churchland; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Nonspecific Inhibition of the Motor System during Response Preparation.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Ana Sias; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  The supplementary motor area modulates interhemispheric interactions during movement preparation.

Authors:  Quentin Welniarz; Cécile Gallea; Jean-Charles Lamy; Aurélie Méneret; Traian Popa; Romain Valabregue; Benoît Béranger; Vanessa Brochard; Constance Flamand-Roze; Oriane Trouillard; Cécilia Bonnet; Norbert Brüggemann; Pierre Bitoun; Bertrand Degos; Cécile Hubsch; Elodie Hainque; Jean-Louis Golmard; Marie Vidailhet; Stéphane Lehéricy; Isabelle Dusart; Sabine Meunier; Emmanuel Roze
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spanish Version of the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire.

Authors:  María José Pérez-Fabello; Alfredo Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-20

4.  Electrocorticographic dissociation of alpha and beta rhythmic activity in the human sensorimotor system.

Authors:  Arjen Stolk; Loek Brinkman; Mariska J Vansteensel; Erik Aarnoutse; Frans Ss Leijten; Chris H Dijkerman; Robert T Knight; Floris P de Lange; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Influence of post-stroke fatigue on reaction times and corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.

Authors:  William De Doncker; Katlyn E Brown; Annapoorna Kuppuswamy
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Insights into the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and motor imagery in a training-based approach.

Authors:  Amandine Bouguetoch; Alain Martin; Sidney Grosprêtre
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Imagery of movements immediately following performance allows learning of motor skills that interfere.

Authors:  Hannah R Sheahan; James N Ingram; Goda M Žalalytė; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.