Literature DB >> 26224853

Nonspecific Inhibition of the Motor System during Response Preparation.

Ian Greenhouse1, Ana Sias2, Ludovica Labruna2, Richard B Ivry2.   

Abstract

Motor system excitability is transiently inhibited during the preparation of responses. Previous studies have attributed this inhibition to the operation of two mechanisms, one hypothesized to help resolve competition between alternative response options, and the other to prevent premature response initiation. By this view, inhibition should be restricted to task-relevant muscles. Although this prediction is supported in one previous study (Duque et al., 2010), studies of stopping ongoing actions suggest that some forms of motor inhibition may be widespread (Badry et al., 2009). This motivated us to conduct a series of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments to examine in detail the specificity of preparatory inhibition in humans. Motor-evoked potentials were inhibited in task-irrelevant muscles during response preparation, even when the muscles were contralateral and not homologous to the responding effector. Inhibition was also observed in both choice and simple response task conditions, with and without a preparatory interval. Control experiments ruled out that this inhibition is due to expectancy of TMS or a possible need to cancel the prepared response. These findings suggest that motor inhibition during response preparation broadly influences the motor system and likely reflects a process that occurs whenever a response is selected. We propose a reinterpretation of the functional significance of preparatory inhibition, one by which inhibition reduces noise to enhance signal processing and modulates the gain of a selected response. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Motor preparation entails the recruitment of excitatory and inhibitory neural mechanisms. The current experiments address the specificity of inhibitory mechanisms, asking whether preparatory inhibition affects task-irrelevant muscles. Participants prepared a finger movement to be executed at the end of a short delay period. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex provided an assay of corticospinal excitability. Consistent with earlier work, the agonist muscle for the forthcoming response was inhibited during the preparatory period. Moreover, this inhibition was evident in task-irrelevant muscles, although the magnitude of inhibition depended on whether the response was fixed or involved a choice. These results implicate a broadly tuned inhibitory mechanism that facilitates response preparation, perhaps by lowering background activity before response initiation.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3510675-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action selection; decision-making; gain modulation; inhibition; response preparation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26224853      PMCID: PMC4518047          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1436-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  Inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic generation of low force.

Authors:  J Liepert; C Dettmers; C Terborg; C Weiller
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Pre-movement motor excitability is reduced ipsilateral to low force pinch grips.

Authors:  A C Weiss; C Weiller; J Liepert
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  Functional significance of the cortico-subthalamo-pallidal 'hyperdirect' pathway.

Authors:  Atsushi Nambu; Hironobu Tokuno; Masahiko Takada
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.304

5.  Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.

Authors:  Marius Usher; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Neural variability in premotor cortex provides a signature of motor preparation.

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; Byron M Yu; Stephen I Ryu; Gopal Santhanam; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  Reda Badry; Tatsuya Mima; Toshihiko Aso; Masahiro Nakatsuka; Mitsunari Abe; Dina Fathi; Nageh Foly; Hamdy Nagiub; Takashi Nagamine; Hidenao Fukuyama
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Dissociating the influence of response selection and task anticipation on corticospinal suppression during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ludovica Labruna; Christian Cazares; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; David Lew; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  44 in total

1.  Reward anticipation and punishment anticipation are instantiated in the brain via opponent mechanisms.

Authors:  Jessica I Lake; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Zachary P Infantolino; Laura D Crocker; Cindy M Yee; Wendy Heller; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Predictive Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability and Implicit Encoding of Movement Probability in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lucile Dupin; Loïc Carment; Laura Guedj; Macarena Cuenca; Marie-Odile Krebs; Marc A Maier; Isabelle Amado; Påvel G Lindberg
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Gain control in the sensorimotor system.

Authors:  Eiman Azim; Kazuhiko Seki
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2019-03-22

4.  Effects of intentional movement preparation on response times to symbolic and imitative cues.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Amentha Rajagobal; Carl Michael Galang; Luisa Sartori; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Individual Differences in Resting Corticospinal Excitability Are Correlated with Reaction Time and GABA Content in Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Maedbh King; Sean Noah; Richard J Maddock; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual-attentional conflicts during auditory processing.

Authors:  Nico Adelhöfer; Krutika Gohil; Susanne Passow; Benjamin Teufert; Veit Roessner; Shu-Chen Li; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Stop-related subthalamic beta activity indexes global motor suppression in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Ayda Ghahremani; Kaviraja Udupa; Utpal Saha; Suneil K Kalia; Mojgan Hodaie; Andres M Lozano; Adam R Aron; Robert Chen
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 10.338

9.  The Neural Specificity of Movement Preparation During Actual and Imagined Movements.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Célia Ruffino; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Prefronto-Striatal Structural Connectivity Mediates Adult Age Differences in Action Selection.

Authors:  Amirhossein Rasooli; Hamed Zivari Adab; Sima Chalavi; Thiago S Monteiro; Thijs Dhollander; Dante Mantini; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.