Literature DB >> 30785815

Planning face, hand, and leg movements: anatomical constraints on preparatory inhibition.

Ludovica Labruna1,2, Claudia Tischler1, Christian Cazares3, Ian Greenhouse4, Julie Duque5, Florent Lebon6, Richard B Ivry1,2.   

Abstract

Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the motor cortex, are reduced during the preparatory period in delayed response tasks. In this study we examined how MEP suppression varies as a function of the anatomical organization of the motor cortex. MEPs were recorded from a left index muscle while participants prepared a hand or leg movement in experiment 1 or prepared an eye or mouth movement in experiment 2. In this manner, we assessed if the level of MEP suppression in a hand muscle varied as a function of the anatomical distance between the agonist for the forthcoming movement and the muscle targeted by TMS. MEP suppression was attenuated when the cued effector was anatomically distant from the hand (e.g., leg or facial movement compared with finger movement). A similar effect was observed in experiment 3 in which MEPs were recorded from a muscle in the leg and the forthcoming movement involved the upper limb or face. These results demonstrate an important constraint on preparatory inhibition: it is sufficiently broad to be manifest in a muscle that is not involved in the task, but it is not global, showing a marked attenuation when the agonist muscle belongs to a different segment of the body. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we examined changes in corticospinal excitability as people prepared to move. Consistent with previous work, we observed a reduction in excitability during the preparatory period, an effect observed in both task-relevant and task-irrelevant muscles. However, this preparatory inhibition is anatomically constrained, attenuated in muscles belonging to a different body segment than the agonist of the forthcoming movement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; motor cortex; movement; preparatory inhibition; somatotopy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30785815      PMCID: PMC6589713          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00711.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Ethological Action Maps: A Paradigm Shift for the Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Dissociating the influence of response selection and task anticipation on corticospinal suppression during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ludovica Labruna; Christian Cazares; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The minimal number of TMS trials required for the reliable assessment of corticospinal excitability, short interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation.

Authors:  Mana Biabani; Michael Farrell; Maryam Zoghi; Gary Egan; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Generic inhibition of the selected movement and constrained inhibition of nonselected movements during response preparation.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Florent Lebon; Julie Duque; Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Christian Cazares; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Selective Suppression of Local Interneuron Circuits in Human Motor Cortex Contributes to Movement Preparation.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Sean E Cavanagh; Sara Tremblay; Sara Simeoni; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rocco Cavaleri; Siobhan M Schabrun; Lucy S Chipchase
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-06

10.  Comparison of Motor Inhibition in Variants of the Instructed-Delay Choice Reaction Time Task.

Authors:  Caroline Quoilin; Julien Lambert; Benvenuto Jacob; Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Julie Duque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hasty sensorimotor decisions rely on an overlap of broad and selective changes in motor activity.

Authors:  Gerard Derosiere; David Thura; Paul Cisek; Julie Duque
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 9.593

3.  VETA: An Open-Source Matlab-Based Toolbox for the Collection and Analysis of Electromyography Combined With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Nicko Jackson; Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  A TMS study of preparatory suppression in binge drinkers.

Authors:  Julien Grandjean; Julie Duque
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments.

Authors:  Laurie Geers; Mauro Pesenti; Gerard Derosiere; Julie Duque; Laurence Dricot; Michael Andres
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.