Literature DB >> 34312403

Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance.

Mario Paci1, Giulio Di Cosmo2, Mauro Gianni Perrucci2,3, Francesca Ferri2,3, Marcello Costantini3,4.   

Abstract

Inhibitory control is the ability to suppress inappropriate movements and unwanted actions, allowing to regulate impulses and responses. This ability can be measured via the Stop Signal Task, which provides a temporal index of response inhibition, namely the stop signal reaction time (SSRT). At the neural level, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) allows to investigate motor inhibition within the primary motor cortex (M1), such as the cortical silent period (CSP) which is an index of GABAB-mediated intracortical inhibition within M1. Although there is strong evidence that intracortical inhibition varies during action stopping, it is still not clear whether differences in the neurophysiological markers of intracortical inhibition contribute to behavioral differences in actual inhibitory capacities. Hence, here we explored the relationship between intracortical inhibition within M1 and behavioral response inhibition. GABABergic-mediated inhibition in M1 was determined by the duration of CSP, while behavioral inhibition was assessed by the SSRT. We found a significant positive correlation between CSP's duration and SSRT, namely that individuals with greater levels of GABABergic-mediated inhibition seem to perform overall worse in inhibiting behavioral responses. These results support the assumption that individual differences in intracortical inhibition are mirrored by individual differences in action stopping abilities.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34312403     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94494-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  53 in total

1.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period.

Authors:  M A VINCE
Journal:  Br J Psychol Gen Sect       Date:  1948-03

Review 3.  Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Janette L Smith; Richard P Mattick; Sharna D Jamadar; Jaimi M Iredale
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 4.  A systematic review of the relationship between eating, weight and inhibitory control using the stop signal task.

Authors:  Savani Bartholdy; Bethan Dalton; Owen G O'Daly; Iain C Campbell; Ulrike Schmidt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; David Lew; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Inhibition in ADHD, aggressive, and anxious children: a biologically based model of child psychopathology.

Authors:  J Oosterlaan; J A Sergeant
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1996-02

7.  Variations in response control within at-risk gamblers and non-gambling controls explained by GABAergic inhibition in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Nahian S Chowdhury; Evan J Livesey; Alex Blaszczynski; Justin A Harris
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Trisha Van Zandt; Frederick Verbruggen; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Neurocognitive endophenotypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Lara Menzies; Sophie Achard; Samuel R Chamberlain; Naomi Fineberg; Chi-Hua Chen; Natalia del Campo; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins; Ed Bullmore
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Fictitious inhibitory differences: how skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.