Literature DB >> 25698053

Better-ear glimpsing in hearing-impaired listeners.

Virginia Best1, Christine R Mason1, Gerald Kidd1, Nandini Iyer2, Douglas S Brungart3.   

Abstract

When competing speech sounds are spatially separated, listeners can make use of the ear with the better target-to-masker ratio. Recent studies showed that listeners with normal hearing are able to efficiently make use of this "better-ear," even when it alternates between left and right ears at different times in different frequency bands, which may contribute to the ability to listen in spatialized speech mixtures. In the present study, better-ear glimpsing in listeners with bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment, who perform poorly in spatialized speech mixtures, was investigated. The results suggest that this deficit is not related to better-ear glimpsing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698053      PMCID: PMC4327925          DOI: 10.1121/1.4907737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluation of speech intelligibility with the coordinate response measure.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  ARTICULATION-TESTING METHODS: CONSONANTAL DIFFERENTIATION WITH A CLOSED-RESPONSE SET.

Authors:  A S HOUSE; C E WILLIAMS; M H HEKER; K D KRYTER
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of better-ear glimpsing on spatial release from masking.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Jörg Buchholz; Harvey Dillon; Virginia Best; Louise Hickson; Sharon Cameron
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Nandini Iyer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.

Authors:  John F Culling; Elizabeth R Mansell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon; Louise Hickson; Mark Seeto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural Glimpses at the Cocktail Party?

Authors:  Andrea Lingner; Benedikt Grothe; Lutz Wiegrebe; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 4.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Bobby E Gibbs; Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?

Authors:  Brandi Jett; Emily Buss; Virginia Best; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kevin Xu; Shelby Willis; Quinton Gopen; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.

Authors:  Baljeet Rana; Jörg M Buchholz; Catherine Morgan; Mridula Sharma; Tobias Weller; Shivali Appaiah Konganda; Kyoko Shirai; Atsushi Kawano
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  A Competing Voices Test for Hearing-Impaired Listeners Applied to Spatial Separation and Ideal Time-Frequency Masks.

Authors:  Lars Bramsløw; Marianna Vatti; Rikke Rossing; Gaurav Naithani; Niels Henrik Pontoppidan
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.