Literature DB >> 25690581

Effects of word length on eye movement control: The evidence from Arabic.

Kevin B Paterson1, Abubaker A A Almabruk2,3, Victoria A McGowan2, Sarah J White2, Timothy R Jordan4.   

Abstract

The finding that word length plays a fundamental role in determining where and for how long readers fixate within a line of text has been central to the development of sophisticated models of eye movement control. However, research in this area is dominated by the use of Latinate languages (e.g., English, French, German), and little is known about eye movement control for alphabetic languages with very different visual characteristics. To address this issue, the present experiment undertook a novel investigation of the influence of word length on eye movement behavior when reading Arabic. Arabic is an alphabetic language that not only is read from right to left but has visual characteristics fundamentally different from Latinate languages, and so is ideally suited to testing the generality of mechanisms of eye movement control. The findings reveal that readers were more likely to fixate and refixate longer words, and also that longer words tended to be fixated for longer. In addition, word length influenced the landing positions of initial fixations on words, with the effect that readers fixated the center of short words and fixated closer to the beginning letters for longer words, and the location of landing positions affected both the duration of the first fixation and probability of refixating the word. The indication now, therefore, is that effects of word length are a widespread and fundamental component of reading and play a central role in guiding eye-movement behavior across a range of very different alphabetic systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabic; Eye movement control; Eye movements during reading

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25690581     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0809-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  33 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Aging and the control of binocular fixations during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-08-26

5.  Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev; Mengyun Xu
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers' eye movement patterns.

Authors:  Jarkko Hautala; Jukka Hyönä; Mikko Aro
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis.

Authors:  M Annett
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1970-08

10.  Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: is there a preferred viewing location?

Authors:  Xingshan Li; Pingping Liu; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  10 in total

1.  What's in a Typeface? Evidence of the Existence of Print Personalities in Arabic.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Alya S AlShamsi; Hajar A K Yekani; Maryam AlJassmi; Nada Al Dosari; Ehab W Hermena; Mercedes Sheen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-18

2.  Reading Rate and Comprehension for Text Presented on Tablet and Paper: Evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Ehab W Hermena; Mercedes Sheen; Maryam AlJassmi; Khulood AlFalasi; Maha AlMatroushi; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-21

3.  Interaction effects of aging, word frequency, and predictability on saccade length in Chinese reading.

Authors:  Zhifang Liu; Wen Tong; Yongqiang Su
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.

Authors:  Maryam A AlJassmi; Kayleigh L Warrington; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics.

Authors:  Ehab W Hermena; Sana Bouamama; Simon P Liversedge; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Unsupervised Text Segmentation Predicts Eye Fixations During Reading.

Authors:  Jinbiao Yang; Antal van den Bosch; Stefan L Frank
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-23

7.  Aging and the optimal viewing position effect in Chinese.

Authors:  Pingping Liu; Danlu Liu; Buxin Han; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-29

8.  Investigating the Effectiveness of Spatial Frequencies to the Left and Right of Central Vision during Reading: Evidence from Reading Times and Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18

9.  Effects of word length on eye guidance differ for young and older Chinese readers.

Authors:  Sha Li; Lin Li; Jingxin Wang; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-06

10.  Parafoveal processing of orthographic, morphological, and semantic information during reading Arabic: A boundary paradigm investigation.

Authors:  Ehab W Hermena; Eida J Juma; Maryam AlJassmi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.