Literature DB >> 19576580

Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.

Timothy R Jordan1, Kevin B Paterson, Stoyan Kurtev, Mengyun Xu.   

Abstract

It has been claimed that word recognition is affected fundamentally by the precise location at which a word is fixated because a precise split in hemispheric processing at the point of fixation causes all letters to the left and right of fixation to project to different, contralateral hemispheres. To assess this claim, 5-letter words (and nonwords) were presented for lexical decision when participants fixated the space immediately to the left (location 1) or right (location 6) of each stimulus, or one of the four possible inter-letter spaces (locations 2-5). Fixation location was controlled using an eye-tracker linked to a fixation-contingent display and all stimuli were presented entirely within foveal vision to avoid confounding influences of extrafoveal hemispheric projections. Performance was equally poorest when fixating locations 1 and 6 (when words were shown entirely to either the right and left of fixation), intermediate for location 5, and equally superior for locations 2, 3, and 4. Additional word-specific analyses also showed no evidence of the effects of fixation location on optimal word recognition predicted by split-fovea processing. These findings suggest that, while fixation location influences word recognition, word recognition is apparently not affected by a split in hemispheric processing at the point of fixation and does not depend critically on the precise location at which a word is fixated. Implications of these findings for the role of fixation location in word recognition are discussed. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19576580     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  7 in total

1.  Effects of word length on eye movement control: The evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Abubaker A A Almabruk; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

2.  An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Giorgio Fuggetta; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev; Mengyun Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Functional foveal splitting: evidence from neuropsychological and multimodal MRI investigations in a Chinese patient with a splenium lesion.

Authors:  Benyan Luo; Chunlei Shan; Renjing Zhu; Xuchu Weng; Sheng He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Aging and the optimal viewing position effect in visual word recognition: Evidence from English.

Authors:  Lin Li; Sha Li; Jingxin Wang; Victoria A McGowan; Pingping Liu; Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-04-13

5.  Aging and the optimal viewing position effect in Chinese.

Authors:  Pingping Liu; Danlu Liu; Buxin Han; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-29

6.  Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Mercedes Sheen; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Investigating the Effectiveness of Spatial Frequencies to the Left and Right of Central Vision during Reading: Evidence from Reading Times and Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.