Literature DB >> 24613039

40-Hz multiple auditory steady-state responses to narrow-band chirps in sedated and anaesthetized infants.

Roland Mühler1, Torsten Rahne2, Katrin Mentzel3, Jesko L Verhey3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The general consensus to date has been that a stimulus repetition rate of 40Hz is not appropriate for the recording of auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) in sedated or anaesthetized infants. The aim of this study was to investigate whether reliable 40-Hz ASSR thresholds can be obtained in sedated infants using narrow-band chirp stimuli in the clinical routine.
METHODS: 40-Hz auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and 40-Hz ASSR were recorded in 34 infants below the age of 48 months under sedation or under general anaesthesia. ABR were evoked by broad-band chirp stimuli with a flat amplitude spectrum. ASSR were recorded simultaneously from both ears with an adaptive multiple stimulus paradigm using four narrow-band chirps centred at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000Hz. ABR and ASSR thresholds were evaluated to determine differences between the estimates from the two methods.
RESULTS: Despite of sedation and anaesthesia, large wave V amplitudes of the chirp evoked 40-Hz ABR were found at levels as low as 10dB above the individual ABR threshold. ASSR thresholds for stimulus repetition rates of 40Hz could be consistently estimated in all 34 infants. Thresholds estimated from the ASSR for the four frequencies of the narrow-band chirps and the threshold derived from the broad-band chirp ABR differ, on average by 3.7dB for the frequency range of 1000-2000Hz and 7.1dB for the frequency range from 2000 to 4000Hz.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to the general assumption that 40-Hz ASSR are not appropriate for threshold estimation in infants our results demonstrate that multiple ASSR with a stimulus repetition rate of 40Hz can be recorded in sedated and anaesthetized infants using narrow-band chirps. Threshold estimates obtained with 40-Hz ASSR are, on average, slightly higher than those obtained with chirp evoked ABR but allow for a frequency specific characterisation of the hearing ability.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613039     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  9 in total

1.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Bahram Jalaei; Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Objective frequency-specific measurement of hearing threshold using narrow-band chirp stimuli with level-adaptive simultaneous masking].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Simultaneous acquisition of 40- and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses for a direct comparison of response amplitude, residual noise and signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Alexandra Petzke; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

6.  [Objective audiometry and clinical application].

Authors:  M Cebulla; D Ehrmann-Müller; W Shehata-Dieler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  [Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve function during cerebello-pontine angle surgery].

Authors:  S Rampp; T Rahne; S K Plontke; C Strauss; J Prell
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  [Objective diagnostic methods in pediatric audiology].

Authors:  R Mühler; S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Longitudinal Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Preterm and Term Infants: The Maturation Process.

Authors:  Ana Constantino Sousa; Dayane Domeneghini Didoné; Pricila Sleifer
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.