Literature DB >> 2350303

Head size as a basis of gender difference in the latency of the brainstem auditory-evoked response.

M Aoyagi1, Y Kim, J Yokoyama, T Kiren, Y Suzuki, Y Koike.   

Abstract

In order to discuss the source of gender difference in the latencies of the brainstem auditory-evoked response (ABR), correlation analysis between head size (nasion to inion, ear to ear and circumference) and ABR latencies were investigated in 107 adults (57 males and 50 females) with normal hearing. Wave III and wave V latencies and I-III and I-V interpeak latency intervals (IPL) were significantly shorter in females than in males. Moreover, head size of the male subjects was significantly larger than the female subjects' head size with respect to all three parameters. Significant positive correlations were obtained between head size and the above-mentioned ABR wave latencies and IPLs, even when each gender was analyzed separately. These results suggest that head size, which may reflect brain size, is one of the important factors for the basis of gender difference in ABR latencies.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2350303     DOI: 10.3109/00206099009081652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  12 in total

1.  Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Bahram Jalaei; Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Objective frequency-specific measurement of hearing threshold using narrow-band chirp stimuli with level-adaptive simultaneous masking].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Quantitative assessment of field strength, total intracranial volume, sex, and age effects on the goodness of harmonization for volumetric analysis on the ADNI database.

Authors:  Da Ma; Karteek Popuri; Mahadev Bhalla; Oshin Sangha; Donghuan Lu; Jiguo Cao; Claudia Jacova; Lei Wang; Mirza Faisal Beg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; Alexander Hardy; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-19

6.  Sex and gestational age effects on auditory brainstem responses in preterm and term infants.

Authors:  Mingyan Li; Li Zhu; Xiaoqin Mai; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff; Zhengyan Zhao
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Association Between Sex and Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adults, and Relationship to Sex Hormone Levels.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Dan Wang; Xiaoting Li; Wang Ningyu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-05-14

8.  Musical Sophistication and the Effect of Complexity on Auditory Discrimination in Finnish Speakers.

Authors:  Caitlin Dawson; Daniel Aalto; Juraj Šimko; Martti Vainio; Mari Tervaniemi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Sex differences in subcortical auditory processing only partially explain higher prevalence of language disorders in males.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Silvia Bonacina; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Effect of stimuli, transducers and gender on acoustic change complex.

Authors:  Hemanth Narayan Shetty; Manjula Puttabasappa
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.