Literature DB >> 25680520

Invariance in current dipole moment density across brain structures and species: physiological constraint for neuroimaging.

Shingo Murakami1, Yoshio Okada2.   

Abstract

Although anatomical constraints have been shown to be effective for MEG and EEG inverse solutions, there are still no effective physiological constraints. Strength of the current generator is normally described by the moment of an equivalent current dipole Q. This value is quite variable since it depends on size of active tissue. In contrast, the current dipole moment density q, defined as Q per surface area of active cortex, is independent of size of active tissue. Here we studied whether the value of q has a maximum in physiological conditions across brain structures and species. We determined the value due to the primary neuronal current (q primary) alone, correcting for distortions due to measurement conditions and secondary current sources at boundaries separating regions of differing electrical conductivities. The values were in the same range for turtle cerebellum (0.56-1.48 nAm/mm(2)), guinea pig hippocampus (0.30-1.34 nAm/mm(2)), and swine neocortex (0.18-1.63 nAm/mm(2)), rat neocortex (~2.2 nAm/mm(2)), monkey neocortex (~0.40 nAm/mm(2)) and human neocortex (0.16-0.77 nAm/mm(2)). Thus, there appears to be a maximum value across the brain structures and species (1-2 nAm/mm(2)). The empirical values closely matched the theoretical values obtained with our independently validated neural network model (1.6-2.8 nAm/mm(2) for initial spike and 0.7-3.1 nAm/mm(2) for burst), indicating that the apparent invariance is not coincidental. Our model study shows that a single maximum value may exist across a wide range of brain structures and species, varying in neuron density, due to fundamental electrical properties of neurons. The maximum value of q primary may serve as an effective physiological constraint for MEG/EEG inverse solutions.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Current source density analysis; Electroencephalography; Inverse solution; Magnetoencephalography; Neural current MRI; Neuroenergetics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25680520      PMCID: PMC4415154          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  60 in total

1.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity.

Authors:  A M Dale; A K Liu; B R Fischl; R L Buckner; J W Belliveau; J D Lewine; E Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Direct measurement of specific membrane capacitance in neurons.

Authors:  L J Gentet; G J Stuart; J D Clements
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Pitfalls in the dipolar model for the neocortical EEG sources.

Authors:  Jorge J Riera; Takeshi Ogawa; Takakuni Goto; Akira Sumiyoshi; Hiroi Nonaka; Alan Evans; Hiroyoshi Miyakawa; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Experimental optimization of current source-density technique for anuran cerebellum.

Authors:  J A Freeman; C Nicholson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Physiological bases of the synchronized population spikes and slow wave of the magnetic field generated by a guinea-pig longitudinal CA3 slice preparation.

Authors:  J Wu; Y C Okada
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-11

6.  Theoretical analysis of field potentials in anisotropic ensembles of neuronal elements.

Authors:  C Nicholson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  An evaluation of the conductivity profile in the somatosensory barrel cortex of Wistar rats.

Authors:  Takakuni Goto; Rieko Hatanaka; Takeshi Ogawa; Akira Sumiyoshi; Jorge Riera; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  An electron microscopic study of the types and proportions of neurons in the cortex of the motor and visual areas of the cat and rat.

Authors:  D A Winfield; K C Gatter; T P Powell
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Reliable detection of bilateral activation in human primary somatosensory cortex by unilateral median nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew T Sutherland; Akaysha C Tang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Dipole source analyses of laser evoked potentials obtained from subdural grid recordings from primary somatic sensory cortex.

Authors:  Ulf Baumgärtner; Hagen Vogel; Shinji Ohara; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Fred Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  13 in total

1.  Statistical power: Implications for planning MEG studies.

Authors:  Maximilien Chaumon; Aina Puce; Nathalie George
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Direct neural current imaging in an intact cerebellum with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Padmavathi Sundaram; Aapo Nummenmaa; William Wells; Darren Orbach; Daniel Orringer; Robert Mulkern; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Simulating human sleep spindle MEG and EEG from ion channel and circuit level dynamics.

Authors:  B Q Rosen; G P Krishnan; P Sanda; M Komarov; T Sejnowski; N Rulkov; I Ulbert; L Eross; J Madsen; O Devinsky; W Doyle; D Fabo; S Cash; M Bazhenov; E Halgren
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Enhanced Modeling of Neurophysiological Recordings.

Authors:  Sergey N Makarov; Matti Hamalainen; Yoshio Okada; Gregory M Noetscher; Jyrki Ahveninen; Aapo Nummenmaa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Local recording of biological magnetic fields using Giant Magneto Resistance-based micro-probes.

Authors:  Francesca Barbieri; Vincent Trauchessec; Laure Caruso; Josué Trejo-Rosillo; Bartosz Telenczuk; Elodie Paul; Thierry Bal; Alain Destexhe; Claude Fermon; Myriam Pannetier-Lecoeur; Gilles Ouanounou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Using generative models to make probabilistic statements about hippocampal engagement in MEG.

Authors:  Sofie S Meyer; Holly Rossiter; Matthew J Brookes; Mark W Woolrich; Sven Bestmann; Gareth R Barnes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Permutation Statistics for Connectivity Analysis between Regions of Interest in EEG and MEG Data.

Authors:  Fahimeh Mamashli; Matti Hämäläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; Tal Kenet; Sheraz Khan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Incorporating priors for EEG source imaging and connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Xu Lei; Taoyu Wu; Pedro A Valdes-Sosa
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Evaluation of realistic layouts for next generation on-scalp MEG: spatial information density maps.

Authors:  Bushra Riaz; Christoph Pfeiffer; Justin F Schneiderman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Non-invasive laminar inference with MEG: Comparison of methods and source inversion algorithms.

Authors:  James J Bonaiuto; Holly E Rossiter; Sofie S Meyer; Natalie Adams; Simon Little; Martina F Callaghan; Fred Dick; Sven Bestmann; Gareth R Barnes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.