Literature DB >> 22539822

Pitfalls in the dipolar model for the neocortical EEG sources.

Jorge J Riera1, Takeshi Ogawa, Takakuni Goto, Akira Sumiyoshi, Hiroi Nonaka, Alan Evans, Hiroyoshi Miyakawa, Ryuta Kawashima.   

Abstract

For about six decades, primary current sources of the electroencephalogram (EEG) have been assumed dipolar in nature. In this study, we used electrophysiological recordings from anesthetized Wistar rats undergoing repeated whisker deflections to revise the biophysical foundations of the EEG dipolar model. In a first experiment, we performed three-dimensional recordings of extracellular potentials from a large portion of the barrel field to estimate intracortical multipolar moments generated either by single spiking neurons (i.e., pyramidal cells, PC; spiny stellate cells, SS) or by populations of them while experiencing synchronized postsynaptic potentials. As expected, backpropagating spikes along PC dendrites caused dipolar field components larger in the direction perpendicular to the cortical surface (49.7 ± 22.0 nA·mm). In agreement with the fact that SS cells have "close-field" configurations, their dipolar moment at any direction was negligible. Surprisingly, monopolar field components were detectable both at the level of single units (i.e., -11.7 ± 3.4 nA for PC) and at the mesoscopic level of mixed neuronal populations receiving extended synaptic inputs within either a cortical column (-0.44 ± 0.20 μA) or a 2.5-m(3)-voxel volume (-3.32 ± 1.20 μA). To evaluate the relationship between the macroscopically defined EEG equivalent dipole and the mesoscopic intracortical multipolar moments, we performed concurrent recordings of high-resolution skull EEG and laminar local field potentials. From this second experiment, we estimated the time-varying EEG equivalent dipole for the entire barrel field using either a multiple dipole fitting or a distributed type of EEG inverse solution. We demonstrated that mesoscopic multipolar components are altogether absorbed by any equivalent dipole in both types of inverse solutions. We conclude that the primary current sources of the EEG in the neocortex of rodents are not precisely represented by a single equivalent dipole and that the existence of monopolar components must be also considered at the mesoscopic level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22539822     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00098.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  33 in total

Review 1.  Modelling and analysis of local field potentials for studying the function of cortical circuits.

Authors:  Gaute T Einevoll; Christoph Kayser; Nikos K Logothetis; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Insertion of linear 8.4 μm diameter 16 channel carbon fiber electrode arrays for single unit recordings.

Authors:  Paras R Patel; Kyounghwan Na; Huanan Zhang; Takashi D Y Kozai; Nicholas A Kotov; Euisik Yoon; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Pitfalls in the interpretation of multielectrode data: on the infeasibility of the neuronal current-source monopoles.

Authors:  Sergey L Gratiy; Klas H Pettersen; Gaute T Einevoll; Anders M Dale
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Generation of field potentials and modulation of their dynamics through volume integration of cortical activity.

Authors:  Yoshinao Kajikawa; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Microcircuitry of agranular frontal cortex: testing the generality of the canonical cortical microcircuit.

Authors:  David C Godlove; Alexander Maier; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A Minimal Biophysical Model of Neocortical Pyramidal Cells: Implications for Frontal Cortex Microcircuitry and Field Potential Generation.

Authors:  Beatriz Herrera; Amirsaman Sajad; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall; Jorge J Riera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Invariance in current dipole moment density across brain structures and species: physiological constraint for neuroimaging.

Authors:  Shingo Murakami; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Electrophysiological Source Imaging: A Noninvasive Window to Brain Dynamics.

Authors:  Bin He; Abbas Sohrabpour; Emery Brown; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Direct Activation of Cortical Neurons in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex of the Rat in Vivo Using Focused Ultrasound.

Authors:  Kush Tripathi; Tongsheng Zhang; Nathan McDannold; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Gösta Ehnholm; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  A biophysically detailed model of neocortical local field potentials predicts the critical role of active membrane currents.

Authors:  Michael W Reimann; Costas A Anastassiou; Rodrigo Perin; Sean L Hill; Henry Markram; Christof Koch
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.