Literature DB >> 26899788

Direct neural current imaging in an intact cerebellum with magnetic resonance imaging.

Padmavathi Sundaram1, Aapo Nummenmaa2, William Wells3, Darren Orbach4, Daniel Orringer5, Robert Mulkern6, Yoshio Okada7.   

Abstract

The ability to detect neuronal currents with high spatiotemporal resolution using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important for studying human brain function in both health and disease. While significant progress has been made, we still lack evidence showing that it is possible to measure an MR signal time-locked to neuronal currents with a temporal waveform matching concurrently recorded local field potentials (LFPs). Also lacking is evidence that such MR data can be used to image current distribution in active tissue. Since these two results are lacking even in vitro, we obtained these data in an intact isolated whole cerebellum of turtle during slow neuronal activity mediated by metabotropic glutamate receptors using a gradient-echo EPI sequence (TR=100ms) at 4.7T. Our results show that it is possible (1) to reliably detect an MR phase shift time course matching that of the concurrently measured LFP evoked by stimulation of a cerebellar peduncle, (2) to detect the signal in single voxels of 0.1mm(3), (3) to determine the spatial phase map matching the magnetic field distribution predicted by the LFP map, (4) to estimate the distribution of neuronal current in the active tissue from a group-average phase map, and (5) to provide a quantitatively accurate theoretical account of the measured phase shifts. The peak values of the detected MR phase shifts were 0.27-0.37°, corresponding to local magnetic field changes of 0.67-0.93nT (for TE=26ms). Our work provides an empirical basis for future extensions to in vivo imaging of neuronal currents.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26899788      PMCID: PMC4873157          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  75 in total

1.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity.

Authors:  A M Dale; A K Liu; B R Fischl; R L Buckner; J W Belliveau; J D Lewine; E Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Imaging periodic currents using alternating balanced steady-state free precession.

Authors:  Giedrius T Buracas; Thomas T Liu; Richard B Buxton; Lawrence R Frank; Eric C Wong
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Climbing fiber-triggered metabotropic slow potentials enhance dendritic calcium transients and simple spike firing in cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Qi Yuan; De-Lai Qiu; John T Weber; Christian Hansel; Thomas Knöpfel
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.314

5.  Failure to direct detect magnetic field dephasing corresponding to ERP generation.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Malcolm J Avison; James C Gatenby; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Microscopic investigation of the resonant mechanism for the implementation of nc-MRI at ultra-low field MRI.

Authors:  A M Cassarà; B Maraviglia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Modeling neuronal current MRI signal with human neuron.

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Xia Jiang; Bin Chen; Yi Zhu; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  The movement of a nerve in a magnetic field: application to MRI Lorentz effect imaging.

Authors:  Bradley J Roth; Adam Luterek; Steffan Puwal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Frequency dependent activation of a slow N-methyl-D-aspartate-dependent excitatory postsynaptic potential in turtle cerebellum by mossy fibre afferents.

Authors:  L J Larson-Prior; P D Morrison; R M Bushey; N T Slater
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  The MR detection of neuronal depolarization during 3-Hz spike-and-wave complexes in generalized epilepsy.

Authors:  Adam D Liston; Afraim Salek-Haddadi; Stefan J Kiebel; Khalid Hamandi; Robert Turner; Louis Lemieux
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  9 in total

1.  Direct detection of neural activity in vitro using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Fanrui Fu; Corey Falgas; Stephen Holland; May Boggess; Samuel C Grant; Eung Je Woo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Toward direct MRI of neuro-electro-magnetic oscillations in the human brain.

Authors:  Trong-Kha Truong; Kenneth C Roberts; Marty G Woldorff; Allen W Song
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Optical magnetic detection of single-neuron action potentials using quantum defects in diamond.

Authors:  John F Barry; Matthew J Turner; Jennifer M Schloss; David R Glenn; Yuyu Song; Mikhail D Lukin; Hongkun Park; Ronald L Walsworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Enhanced magnetic transduction of neuronal activity by nanofabricated inductors quantified via finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jack Phillips; Mitchell Glodowski; Yash Gokhale; Matthew Dwyer; Alireza Ashtiani; Aviad Hai
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging technology-bridging the gap between noninvasive human imaging and optical microscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Enhanced Modeling of Neurophysiological Recordings.

Authors:  Sergey N Makarov; Matti Hamalainen; Yoshio Okada; Gregory M Noetscher; Jyrki Ahveninen; Aapo Nummenmaa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Local recording of biological magnetic fields using Giant Magneto Resistance-based micro-probes.

Authors:  Francesca Barbieri; Vincent Trauchessec; Laure Caruso; Josué Trejo-Rosillo; Bartosz Telenczuk; Elodie Paul; Thierry Bal; Alain Destexhe; Claude Fermon; Myriam Pannetier-Lecoeur; Gilles Ouanounou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Detection of fast oscillating magnetic fields using dynamic multiple TR imaging and Fourier analysis.

Authors:  Ki Hwan Kim; Hyo-Im Heo; Sung-Hong Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neuronal current imaging: An experimental method to investigate electrical currents in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy.

Authors:  Daniela M Unger; Roland Wiest; Claus Kiefer; Mathieu Raillard; Guillaume F Dutil; Veronika M Stein; Daniela Schweizer
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.333

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.