Literature DB >> 21593389

Dipole source analyses of laser evoked potentials obtained from subdural grid recordings from primary somatic sensory cortex.

Ulf Baumgärtner1, Hagen Vogel, Shinji Ohara, Rolf-Detlef Treede, Fred Lenz.   

Abstract

The cortical potentials evoked by cutaneous application of a laser stimulus (laser evoked potentials, LEP) often include potentials in the primary somatic sensory cortex (S1), which may be located within the subdivisions of S1 including Brodmann areas 3A, 3B, 1, and 2. The precise location of the LEP generator may clarify the pattern of activation of human S1 by painful stimuli. We now test the hypothesis that the generators of the LEP are located in human Brodmann area 1 or 3A within S1. Local field potential (LFP) source analysis of the LEP was obtained from subdural grids over sensorimotor cortex in two patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. The relationship of LEP dipoles was compared with dipoles for somatic sensory potentials evoked by median nerve stimulation (SEP) and recorded in area 3B (see Baumgärtner U, Vogel H, Ohara S, Treede RD, Lenz FA. J Neurophysiol 104: 3029-3041, 2010). Both patients had an early radial dipole in S1. The LEP dipole was located medial, anterior, and deep to the SEP dipole, which suggests a nociceptive dipole in area 3A. One patient had a later tangential dipole with positivity posterior, which is opposite to the orientation of the SEP dipole in area 3B. The reversal of orientations between modalities is consistent with the cortical surface negative orientation resulting from superficial termination of thalamocortical neurons that receive inputs from the spinothalamic tract. Therefore, the present results suggest that the LEP may result in a radial dipole consistent with a generator in area 3A and a putative later tangential generator in area 3B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21593389      PMCID: PMC3154813          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00135.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  75 in total

1.  Different generators in human temporal-parasylvian cortex account for subdural laser-evoked potentials, auditory-evoked potentials, and event-related potentials.

Authors:  F A Lenz; G Krauss; R D Treede; J L Lee; D Boatman; N Crone; R Minahan; J Port; M Rios
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Generators of short latency human somatosensory-evoked potentials recorded over the spine and scalp.

Authors:  E K Lee; M Seyal
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Cerebral responses to a continual tonic pain stimulus measured using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  S W Derbyshire; A K Jones
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Response of anterior parietal cortex to different modes of same-site skin stimulation.

Authors:  M Tommerdahl; K A Delemos; O V Favorov; C B Metz; C J Vierck; B L Whitsel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Primary somatosensory cortex is actively involved in pain processing in human.

Authors:  M Kanda; T Nagamine; A Ikeda; S Ohara; T Kunieda; N Fujiwara; S Yazawa; N Sawamoto; R Matsumoto; W Taki; H Shibasaki
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-01-24       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Pain affect without pain sensation in a patient with a postcentral lesion.

Authors:  M Ploner; H J Freund; A Schnitzler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Parallel activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices in human pain processing.

Authors:  M Ploner; F Schmitz; H J Freund; A Schnitzler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Frequency representation in the human hand somatosensory cortex: a reappraisal.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; Y Saito; Y Iguchi; T Kimura; T Fukushima; O Terasaki; K Sakuma
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Painful stimuli evoke potentials recorded from the parasylvian cortex in humans.

Authors:  F A Lenz; M Rios; D Chau; G L Krauss; T A Zirh; R P Lesser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Human somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to vibratory stimulation of the index finger: is there frequency organization in SI?

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Mashiko; T Kimura; T Imada
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10
View more
  11 in total

1.  [Pain and epilepsy : A clinical, neuroanatomical and pathophysiological review].

Authors:  P Martin
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related gamma-band activity in the lateral thalamus of humans.

Authors:  J H Kim; J H Chien; C C Liu; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Invariance in current dipole moment density across brain structures and species: physiological constraint for neuroimaging.

Authors:  Shingo Murakami; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Cortical representation of pain in primary sensory-motor areas (S1/M1)--a study using intracortical recordings in humans.

Authors:  Maud Frot; Michel Magnin; François Mauguière; Luis Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Evidence-based source modeling of nociceptive cortical responses: A direct comparison of scalp and intracranial activity in humans.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Hélène Bastuji; Luis Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Electrophysiological correlates of the BOLD signal for EEG-informed fMRI.

Authors:  Teresa Murta; Marco Leite; David W Carmichael; Patrícia Figueiredo; Louis Lemieux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The primary somatosensory cortex and the insula contribute differently to the processing of transient and sustained nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory inputs.

Authors:  Li Hu; Li Zhang; Rui Chen; Hongbo Yu; Hong Li; André Mouraux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Emotional modulation of experimental pain: a source imaging study of laser evoked potentials.

Authors:  Andrej Stancak; Nicholas Fallon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Distinct Somatic Discrimination Reflected by Laser-Evoked Potentials Using Scalp EEG Leads.

Authors:  Jen-Jui Hsueh; Jia-Jin Jason Chen; Fu-Zen Shaw
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.553

10.  EEG frequency tagging to dissociate the cortical responses to nociceptive and nonnociceptive stimuli.

Authors:  Elisabeth Colon; Valéry Legrain; André Mouraux
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.