Literature DB >> 32746015

Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Enhanced Modeling of Neurophysiological Recordings.

Sergey N Makarov, Matti Hamalainen, Yoshio Okada, Gregory M Noetscher, Jyrki Ahveninen, Aapo Nummenmaa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A new numerical modeling approach is proposed which provides forward-problem solutions for both noninvasive recordings (EEG/MEG) and higher-resolution intracranial recordings (iEEG).
METHODS: The algorithm is our recently developed boundary element fast multipole method or BEM-FMM. It is based on the integration of the boundary element formulation in terms of surface charge density and the fast multipole method originating from its inventors. The algorithm still possesses the major advantage of the conventional BEM - high speed - but is simultaneously capable of processing a very large number of surface-based unknowns. As a result, an unprecedented spatial resolution could be achieved, which enables multiscale modeling.
RESULTS: For non-invasive EEG/MEG, we are able to accurately solve the forward problem with approximately 1 mm anatomical resolution in the cortex within 1-2 min given several thousand cortical dipoles. Targeting high-resolution iEEG, we are able to compute, for the first time, an integrated electromagnetic response for an ensemble (2,450) of tightly packed realistic pyramidal neocortical neurons in a full-head model with 0.6 mm anatomical cortical resolution. The neuronal arbor is comprised of 5.9 M elementary 1.2 μm long dipoles. On a standard server, the computations require about 5 min.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the BEM-FMM approach may be well suited to support numerical multiscale modeling pertinent to modern high-resolution and submillimeter iEEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the speed and ease of implementation, this new algorithm represents a method that will greatly facilitate simulations at multi-scale across a variety of applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32746015      PMCID: PMC7704617          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2999271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  34 in total

1.  Fast multipole acceleration of the MEG/EEG boundary element method.

Authors:  Jan Kybic; Maureen Clerc; Olivier Faugeras; Renaud Keriven; Théo Papadopoulo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogeneous volume conductor.

Authors:  D B Geselowitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Big Science, Team Science, and Open Science for Neuroscience.

Authors:  Christof Koch; Allan Jones
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Integral equations and boundary-element solution for static potential in a general piece-wise homogeneous volume conductor.

Authors:  Matti Stenroos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.

Authors:  Johannes Vorwerk; Jae-Hyun Cho; Stefan Rampp; Hajo Hamer; Thomas R Knösche; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method.

Authors:  J W Meijs; O W Weier; M J Peters; A van Oosterom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  A mathematical evaluation of the core conductor model.

Authors:  J Clark; R Plonsey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Comparative performance of the finite element method and the boundary element fast multipole method for problems mimicking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Aung Thu Htet; Guilherme B Saturnino; Edward H Burnham; Gregory M Noetscher; Aapo Nummenmaa; Sergey N Makarov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Personalized tDCS for Focal Epilepsy-A Narrative Review: A Data-Driven Workflow Based on Imaging and EEG Data.

Authors:  Steven Beumer; Paul Boon; Debby C W Klooster; Raymond van Ee; Evelien Carrette; Maarten M Paulides; Rob M C Mestrom
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-07

2.  Boundary element fast multipole method for modeling electrical brain stimulation with voltage and current electrodes.

Authors:  Sergey N Makarov; Laleh Golestanirad; William A Wartman; Bach Thanh Nguyen; Gregory M Noetscher; Jyrki P Ahveninen; Kyoko Fujimoto; Konstantin Weise; Aapo R Nummenmaa
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Age-Related EEG Power Reductions Cannot Be Explained by Changes of the Conductivity Distribution in the Head Due to Brain Atrophy.

Authors:  Mingjian He; Feng Liu; Aapo Nummenmaa; Matti Hämäläinen; Bradford C Dickerson; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.

Authors:  Maria Carla Piastra; Andreas Nüßing; Johannes Vorwerk; Maureen Clerc; Christian Engwer; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.399

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.