I Corcuera-Solano1, A Doshi1, P S Pawha1, D Gui2, A Gaddipati2, L Tanenbaum3. 1. From the Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology (I.C.-S., A.D., P.S.P., L.T.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Radiology, New York, New York. 2. GE Healthcare (D.G., A.G.), Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 3. From the Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology (I.C.-S., A.D., P.S.P., L.T.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Radiology, New York, New York nuromri@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Switching of magnetic field gradients is the primary source of acoustic noise in MR imaging. Sound pressure levels can run as high as 120 dB, capable of producing physical discomfort and at least temporary hearing loss, mandating hearing protection. New technology has made quieter techniques feasible, which range from as low as 80 dB to nearly silent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of new commercially available quiet T2 and quiet FLAIR fast spin-echo PROPELLER acquisitions in comparison with equivalent conventional PROPELLER techniques in current day-to-day practice in imaging of the brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients were prospectively scanned with quiet T2 and quiet T2 FLAIR PROPELLER, in addition to spatial resolution-matched conventional T2 and T2 FLAIR PROPELLER imaging sequences on a clinical 1.5T MR imaging scanner. Measurement of sound pressure levels and qualitative evaluation of relative image quality was performed. RESULTS: Quiet T2 and quiet T2 FLAIR were comparable in image quality with conventional acquisitions, with sound levels of approximately 75 dB, a reduction in average sound pressure levels of up to 28.5 dB, with no significant trade-offs aside from longer scan times. CONCLUSIONS: Quiet FSE provides equivalent image quality at comfortable sound pressure levels at the cost of slightly longer scan times. The significant reduction in potentially injurious noise is particularly important in vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, and the debilitated. Quiet techniques should be considered in these special situations for routine use in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Switching of magnetic field gradients is the primary source of acoustic noise in MR imaging. Sound pressure levels can run as high as 120 dB, capable of producing physical discomfort and at least temporary hearing loss, mandating hearing protection. New technology has made quieter techniques feasible, which range from as low as 80 dB to nearly silent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of new commercially available quiet T2 and quiet FLAIR fast spin-echo PROPELLER acquisitions in comparison with equivalent conventional PROPELLER techniques in current day-to-day practice in imaging of the brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients were prospectively scanned with quiet T2 and quiet T2 FLAIR PROPELLER, in addition to spatial resolution-matched conventional T2 and T2 FLAIR PROPELLER imaging sequences on a clinical 1.5T MR imaging scanner. Measurement of sound pressure levels and qualitative evaluation of relative image quality was performed. RESULTS: Quiet T2 and quiet T2 FLAIR were comparable in image quality with conventional acquisitions, with sound levels of approximately 75 dB, a reduction in average sound pressure levels of up to 28.5 dB, with no significant trade-offs aside from longer scan times. CONCLUSIONS: Quiet FSE provides equivalent image quality at comfortable sound pressure levels at the cost of slightly longer scan times. The significant reduction in potentially injurious noise is particularly important in vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, and the debilitated. Quiet techniques should be considered in these special situations for routine use in clinical practice.
Authors: Michael J Reeves; Marian Brandreth; Elspeth H Whitby; Anthony R Hart; Martyn N J Paley; Paul D Griffiths; John C Stevens Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ek T Tan; Christopher J Hardy; Yunhong Shu; Myung-Ho In; Arnaud Guidon; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein; Thomas K F Foo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 4.668