Literature DB >> 11577900

Laser-evoked potentials to noxious stimulation during hypnotic analgesia and distraction of attention suggest different brain mechanisms of pain control.

M Friederich1, R H Trippe, M Ozcan, T Weiss, H Hecht, W H Miltner.   

Abstract

Psychological accounts of hypnosis have hypothesized that hypnosis and attention might share similar mechanisms and that hypnosis simply represents an extensive state of reduced attention. This assumption implies that reports of pain and electrocortical brain responses to painful stimulation should be similarly reduced when subjects are exposed to suggestions of hypnotic analgesia (HA) or requested to distract their attention from painful stimuli (distraction of attention: DA) as compared to a control condition (CC). To test this hypothesis, we recorded event-related electrical brain potentials to noxious laser-heat stimuli and pain reports during HA, DA, and CC from subjects highly susceptible to hypnotic suggestions. Pain reports were significantly reduced during HA and DA as compared to CC. The amplitudes of the late laser-evoked brain potential (LEP) components N200 and P320 were also significantly smaller during DA than during CC. However, no significant difference of these late LEP amplitudes was obtained for HA as compared to CC. Results indicate that hypnotic analgesia and distraction of attention represent different mechanisms of pain control and involve different brain mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11577900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Moritz M Nickel; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of music engagement on responses to painful stimulation.

Authors:  David H Bradshaw; C Richard Chapman; Robert C Jacobson; Gary W Donaldson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Pain-related and negative semantic priming enhances perceived pain intensity.

Authors:  Maria Richter; Christoph Schroeter; Theresa Puensch; Thomas Straube; Holger Hecht; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  [Pain-induced attention allocation effects versus distraction from pain. Competition over attention resources].

Authors:  Y Roa Romero; W H Miltner; T Weiss
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Heightened eating drive and visual food stimuli attenuate central nociceptive processing.

Authors:  Hazel Wright; Xiaoyun Li; Nicholas B Fallon; Timo Giesbrecht; Anna Thomas; Joanne A Harrold; Jason C G Halford; Andrej Stancak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Switching Between Pain and a Visual Illusion Task: A Laser Evoked Potential Study.

Authors:  Andrej Stancak; Nicholas Fallon; Alessandra Fenu; Katerina Kokmotou; Vicente Soto; Stephanie Cook
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Suggested deafness during hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis compared to a distraction and control condition: A study on subjective experience and cortical brain responses.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Barbara Schmidt; Holger Hecht; Ewald Naumann; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Functional Changes in Brain Activity Using Hypnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Gerhard Wolf; Karin Anna Faerber; Christian Rummel; Ulrike Halsband; Guglielmo Campus
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-13

9.  Suggested visual blockade during hypnosis: Top-down modulation of stimulus processing in a visual oddball task.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Barbara Schmidt; Holger Hecht; Ewald Naumann; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.