Literature DB >> 12136389

Selective attention to pain: a psychophysical investigation.

Charles Spence1, Deborah E Bentley, Nicola Phillips, Francis P McGlone, Anthony K P Jones.   

Abstract

Laboratory research suggests that the processing of painful stimuli can be modulated by selective attention to a particular sensory modality. However, alternative accounts for previous findings remain possible in terms of task-switching and spatial attention effects. In the present study, we examined whether attention can be selectively directed to the pain modality in order to facilitate the processing of the sensory-discriminative aspects of painful laser heat stimuli when these alternatives were ruled out. Participants made speeded spatial discrimination responses to an unpredictable sequence of painful laser heat and visual stimuli presented on the left forearm. On each trial, a symbolic cue predicted the likely modality for the upcoming target on the majority of trials. Participants responded more rapidly when the target was presented in the expected as opposed to the unexpected modality, demonstrating that selective attention can modulate the processing of painful stimuli. These findings are discussed in relation to contemporary theories of crossmodal attention and multisensory information-processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12136389     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1133-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Moritz M Nickel; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The effect of multisensory cues on attention in aging.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Joe Verghese; Kristina Dumas; Cuiling Wang; Roee Holtzer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Visceral pain perception in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and healthy volunteers is affected by the MRI scanner environment.

Authors:  Reuben K Wong; Lukas Van Oudenhove; Xinhua Li; Yang Cao; Khek Yu Ho; Clive H Wilder-Smith
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Let it be? Pain control attempts critically amplify attention to somatosensory input.

Authors:  Wouter Durnez; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-29

5.  Influence of transient spatial attention on the P3 component and perception of painful and non-painful electric stimuli in crossed and uncrossed hands positions.

Authors:  Karolina Świder; Eligiusz Wronka; Joukje M Oosterman; Clementina M van Rijn; Marijtje L A Jongsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Attentional processing of itch.

Authors:  A I M van Laarhoven; S van Damme; A P M Lavrijsen; D M van Ryckeghem; G Crombez; A W M Evers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-24

7.  Neural mechanisms underlying pain's ability to reorient attention: evidence for sensitization of somatic threat detectors.

Authors:  Robert Dowman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  Absence of Evidence or Evidence of Absence? Commentary: Captured by the pain: Pain steady-state evoked potentials are not modulated by selective spatial attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Colon; André Mouraux
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.