Literature DB >> 12237181

Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials.

Valéry Legrain1, Jean-Michel Guérit, Raymond Bruyer, Léon Plaghki.   

Abstract

Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) are brain responses to activation of skin nociceptors by laser heat stimuli. LEPs consist of three components: N1, N2, and P2. Previous reports have suggested that in contrast to earlier activities (N1), LEPs responses after 230-250 ms (N2-P2) are modulated by attention to painful laser stimuli. However, the experimental paradigms used were not designed to specify the attentional processes involved in these LEP modulations. We investigated the effects of selective spatial attention and oddball tasks on LEPs. CO(2) laser stimuli of two different intensities were delivered on the dorsum of both hands of ten subjects. One intensity was frequently presented, and the other rarely. Subjects were asked to pay attention to stimuli delivered on one hand and to count rare stimuli, while ignoring stimuli on the other hand. Frequent and rare attended stimuli evoked enhanced N160 (N1) and N230 (N2) components in comparison to LEPs from unattended stimuli. Both components showed scalp distribution contralateral to the stimulus location. The vertex P400 (P2) was unaffected by spatial attention and stimulus location, but its amplitude increased after rare stimuli, whether attended or unattended. An additional parietal P600 component was induced by the attended rare stimuli. It is suggested that several attentional processes can modify nociceptive processing in the brain at different stages. LEP activities in the time-range of N1 and N2 (120-270 ms) showed evidence of processes modulated by the direction of spatial attention. Conversely, processes underlying P2 (400 ms) were not affected by spatial attention, but by the probability of the stimulus. This probability effect was not due to P3b-related processes that were observed at a later latency (600 ms). Indeed, P600 could be seen as a P3b evoked by conscious detection of rare targets. Copyright 2002 International Association for the Study of Pain

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12237181     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00051-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  57 in total

1.  Excitability of the Adelta nociceptive pathways as assessed by the recovery cycle of laser evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  A Truini; P Rossi; F Galeotti; A Romaniello; M Virtuoso; C De Lena; M Leandri; G Cruccu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of spatial attention in attentional control over pain: an experimental investigation.

Authors:  Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Christopher Eccleston; Katrien Verhoeven; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Attention to painful stimulation enhances gamma-band activity and synchronization in human sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Michael Hauck; Jürgen Lorenz; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency?

Authors:  G D Iannetti; N P Hughes; M C Lee; A Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cold stimuli evoke potentials that can be recorded directly from parasylvian cortex in humans.

Authors:  J D Greenspan; S Ohara; P Franaszczuk; D S Veldhuijzen; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Separating brain processing of pain from that of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Bruno G Oertel; Christine Preibisch; Till Martin; Carmen Walter; Matthias Gamer; Ralf Deichmann; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Understanding the mechanisms through which spatial attention acts on nociception.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Moritz M Nickel; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Emotional conflict in a model modulates nociceptive processing in an onlooker: a laser-evoked potentials study.

Authors:  Matteo Martini; Elia Valentini; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Caloric vestibular stimulation modulates nociceptive evoked potentials.

Authors:  Elisa Raffaella Ferrè; Patrick Haggard; Gabriella Bottini; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.