| Literature DB >> 30638276 |
Nicola Krähenbühl1, Amy L Lenz1, Rich Lisonbee1, Manja Deforth2, Lukas Zwicky2, Beat Hintermann2, Charles L Saltzman1, Andrew E Anderson1, Alexej Barg1.
Abstract
Evaluation of the subtalar joint using conventional radiographs is difficult. The purpose of this study was to assess how the posterior facet of the subtalar joint is projected on eight standard radiographic views of the foot and ankle. Weightbearing computed tomography (CT) scans of 27 volunteers without ankle pathology were performed. Eight standard views of the foot and ankle (antero-posterior [AP] view, mortise view, subtalar view, four different Broden views) were reconstructed using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). The appearance of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint was assessed for each view. In addition, the position of the joint line was projected onto three-dimensional (3-D) models of the calcaneus. We found (i) on the AP view of the ankle joint, the posterior part of the posterior facet is visualized and appears convex (calcaneal side); (ii) on the mortise view of the ankle joint, a slightly more anterior part (compared to the AP view) is visualized and appears either convex or flat; (iii) on the subtalar view, the anterior part of the posterior facet is visualized and appears either convex, flat or concave; and (iv) using the Broden views, the posterior and anterior part of the posterior facet can be visualized. This study clarifies which parts of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint are visualized on eight standard views of the foot and ankle.Entities:
Keywords: anatomy; imaging; subtalar joint; weightbearing CT
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30638276 PMCID: PMC7311051 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Res ISSN: 0736-0266 Impact factor: 3.494