| Literature DB >> 25664862 |
Ching-Wu Hsia1, Ming-Yi Ho2, Hao-Ai Shui3, Chong-Bin Tsai4,5, Min-Jen Tseng6.
Abstract
Dermal papillae (DPs) control the formation of hair shafts. In clinical settings, colchicine (CLC) induces patients' hair shedding. Compared to the control, the ex vivo hair fiber elongation of organ cultured vibrissa hair follicles (HFs) declined significantly after seven days of CLC treatment. The cultured DP cells (DPCs) were used as the experimental model to study the influence of CLC on the protein dynamics of DPs. CLC could alter the morphology and down-regulate the expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), the marker of DPC activity, and induce IκBα phosphorylation of DPCs. The proteomic results showed that CLC modulated the expression patterns (fold>2) of 24 identified proteins, seven down-regulated and 17 up-regulated. Most of these proteins were presumably associated with protein turnover, metabolism, structure and signal transduction. Protein-protein interactions (PPI) among these proteins, established by Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database, revealed that they participate in protein metabolic process, translation, and energy production. Furthermore, ubiquitin C (UbC) was predicted to be the controlling hub, suggesting the involvement of ubiquitin-proteasome system in modulating the pathogenic effect of CLC on DPC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25664862 PMCID: PMC4346914 DOI: 10.3390/ijms16023579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Colchicine (CLC) inhibited the ex vivo elongation of hair fiber. The organ cultured rat vibrissa hair follicles (HFs) were treated with CLC (0.1 and 1 µM) for seven days and the length of HF fiber was determined. The vibrissa HFs with DMSO treatment was taken as control (100%). Data were expressed as the mean from three batch triplicate experiments; bars, ±SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. control group.
Figure 2CLC induced morphological changes (A), reduced ALP expression (B,C) and increased IκBα phosphorylation (D) of dermal papillae cells (DPCs) in vitro. DPCs were treated with DMSO (control) or 2 µM CLC (CLC) for 6 h except for panel D. (A) The morphological alteration of DPCs. Magnification: 200×; (B) The protein level of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in DPCs was detected by Western blot (WB). Arrows indicate the positions of tissue nonspecific ALP (TNAP). In all WB analyses, the loading and transfer of equal amounts of total lysate (20 µg per lane) were confirmed by immuno-detection of Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH); (C) The expression level of ALP mRNA in DPCs was analyzed by qRT-PCR. The level of ALP mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH. Data were expressed as the mean from triplicate experiments; bars, ±SD, ** p < 0.01 vs. control group; (D) the time course of IκBα phosphorylation of DPCs after CLC treatment at indicated times was analyzed by WB.
Figure 3Computed image analysis of Sypro-ruby stained 2-DE gels. (A) The proteomic signature of DPCs; (B) The proteomic signature of DPCs treated with 2 µM CLC for 6 h. The magnified images of four down-regulated and four up-regulated protein spots were also shown below the 2-DE gels, respectively. White arrows indicated the positions of identified proteins on 2-DE gels. The standard spot (SSP) number was the number attributed to each protein spot by PDQuest software. Each SSP number uniquely identified that protein.
Identities of the down-regulated proteins in DPCs treated by 2 µM CLC for 6 h.
| Spot | Protein Name a | Gene Name b | Accession No. c | MOWSE Score d | Theoretical | % Coverage | Representative Peptides f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 1 | Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein |
| P63018 | 2594 | 71,055/5.37 | 69.7 | K.DAGTIAGLNVLR.I; R.ARFEELNADLFR.G; R.IINEPTAAAIAYGLDKK.V |
|
| |||||||
| 2 | ATP synthase subunit, mitochondrial |
| P10719 | 1680 | 56,318/5.19 | 70.9 | K.VLDSGAPIKIPVGPETLGR.I; R.AIAELGIYPAVDPLDSTSR.I; R.IPSAVGYQPTLATD |
|
| |||||||
| 3, 4 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A6 |
| Q63081 | 1498 | 48,542/5.00 | 56.6 | R.GSTAPVGGGSFPNITPR.E; K.IFQKGESPVDYDGGR.T; K.HQSLGGQYGVQGFPTIK.I |
| 5 | Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-II |
| Q5RKI1 | 996 | 46,601/5.33 | 45.2 | K. |
|
| |||||||
| 6 | Vimentin |
| P31000 | 888 | 53,757/5.06 | 39.1 | R.LGDLYEEE |
|
| |||||||
| 7, 8 | Annexin A5 | P14668 | 1601 | 35,779/4.93 | 79.0 | R.ETSGNLENLLLAVVK.S; K.WGTDEEKFITILGTR.S; K.QAYEEEYGSNLEDDVVGDTSGYYQR.M | |
| 9 | 14-3-3 protein ε |
| P62260 | 1067 | 29,326/4.63 | 65.5 | R.YLAEFATGNDR.K; K.LICCDILDVLDK.H; K.LICCDILDVLDKHLIPAANTGESK.V |
a Protein name: name of each matched protein listed in SwissProt.2011 database; b Gene name: name of each matched protein listed in SwissProt.2011 database; c Accession no.: SwissProt.2011 database accession number; d MOWSE score: the score of identified matched protein in Mascot on-line search engine; e Theoretical Mr (Da)/pI: theoretical molecular weight and pI value of the identified matched; f M: oxidized methionine.
Identities of the up-regulated proteins in DPCs treated by 2 µM CLC for 6 h.
| Spot | Protein Name a | Gene Name b | Accession No. c | MOWSE Score d | Theoretical | % Coverage | Representative Peptides f | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| 22 | Peroxiredoxin-6 |
| O35244 | 1145 | 24,860/5.64 | 76.8 | R.DLAILLG | ||
|
| |||||||||
| 10 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 |
| P11598 | 1679 | 57,044/5.88 | 62.4 | K.VDCTANTNTCNK.Y; R.ELNDFISYLQR.E; K.VVVAESFDDIVNAEDK.D | ||
| 11 | 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13 |
| B0BN93 | 1214 | 43,075/5.55 | 64.4 | K.ITVNKVELLV | ||
| 13 | 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 |
| P19945 | 706 | 34,365/5.19 | 49.2 | K.EDLTEIRD | ||
| 19 | Proteasome subunit β type-7 |
| Q9JHW0 | 435 | 30,250/8.13 | 33.2 | K.FRPD | ||
| 23 | Proteasome subunit α type-2 |
| P17220 | 571 | 26,024/6.92 | 59.4 | R.GYSFSLTTFSPSGK.L; K.HIGLVYSG | ||
| 26 | Protein DJ-1 |
| O88767 | 505 | 20,190/6.32 | 63.5 | K.GAEEMETVIPVDI | ||
|
| |||||||||
| 15 | PDZ and LIM domain protein 1 |
| P52944 | 101 | 36,018/6.79 | 11.9 | K.VAASVGNAQK.L; R.SA | ||
| 18 | F-actin-capping protein subunit β |
| Q5XI32 | 813 | 30,952/5.69 | 44.5 | R.RLPPQQIEK.N; R.STL | ||
| 25 | Transgelin |
| P31232 | 414 | 22,645/8.87 | 46.3 | K.AAEDYGVTK.T; K.KYDEELEER.L; R.EFTDSQLQEGK.H | ||
|
| |||||||||
| 12 | Annexin A1 |
| P07150 | 229 | 39,147/69.7 | 12.7 | K.DITSDTSGDFR.N; K.TPAQFDADELR.A; K.GVDEATIIDILTK.R | ||
| 16 | Annexin A3 |
| P14669 | 1347 | 36,569/5.96 | 56.8 | K.ALLTLADGGRDESLK.V; K.NLRDDISSETSGDFR.K; R.G | ||
|
| |||||||||
| 14 | Malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic |
| O88989 | 655 | 36,631/6.16 | 36.5 | K.DLDVAVLVGS | ||
| 17 | 3-mercapto-pyruvate sulfur-transferase |
| P97532 | 525 | 33,205/5.88 | 33.3 | R.AQPEHVISQGR.G; R.HIPGAAFFDIDR.C; K.THEDILENLDAR.R | ||
| 20 | Isoamyl acetate-hydrolyzing esterase 1 |
| Q711G3 | 649 | 28,386/5.63 | 55.4 | R.SVDIPKER.V; R.DCGTDVLDLWTL | ||
| 21 | Latexin |
| Q64361 | 430 | 25,735/5.77 | 34.1 | K.QVTVSCTAEVLYPR.M; K.VQTVQQASKEDIPGR.G; R.AASVAENCINYQQGTPNK.V | ||
| 24 | Glutathione |
| P04906 | 510 | 23,652/6.89 | 52.9 | K.YEELQQTAGR.H; R.TEAESWYQTK.Y; R.TTAENEFV | ||
a Protein name: name of each matched protein listed in SwissProt.2011 database; b Gene name: name of each matched protein listed in SwissProt.2011 database; c Accession no.: SwissProt.2011 database accession number; d MOWSE score: the score of identified matched protein in Mascot on-line search engine; e Theoretical Mr (Da)/pI: theoretical molecular weight and pI value of the identified matched; f M: oxidized methionine.
Figure 4The biological functional distribution and PPI network analysis. (A) The pie chart of 24 differentially expressed proteins. The percentage of the proteins in each group was also described; (B) The PPI network of 24 differentially expressed proteins. The dot-lined square indicated a functional protein cluster. Downward red and upward black arrows indicate down-regulated and up-regulated proteins, respectively (see Table 1 and Table 2 for description). The PPI were shown in the confidence view produced by STRING database. Thicker blue lines represented the stronger associations.