Literature DB >> 25660541

The development of the head direction system before eye opening in the rat.

Hui Min Tan1, Joshua Pope Bassett2, John O'Keefe3, Francesca Cacucci4, Thomas Joseph Wills5.   

Abstract

Head direction (HD) cells are neurons found in the hippocampal formation and connected areas that fire as a function of an animal's directional orientation relative to its environment. They integrate self-motion and environmental sensory information to update directional heading. Visual landmarks, in particular, exert strong control over the preferred direction of HD cell firing. The HD signal has previously been shown to appear adult-like as early as postnatal day 16 (P16) in the rat pup, just after eye opening and coinciding with the first spontaneous exploration of its environment. In order to determine whether the HD circuit can begin its organization prior to the onset of patterned vision, we recorded from the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus (ADN) and its postsynaptic target in the hippocampal formation, the dorsal pre-subiculum (PrSd), before and after eye opening in pre-weanling rats. We find that HD cells can be recorded at the earliest age sampled (P12), several days before eye opening. However, this early HD signal displays low directional information content and lacks stability both within and across trials. Following eye opening, the HD system matures rapidly, as more cells exhibit directional firing, and the quality and reliability of the directional signal improves dramatically. Cue-rotation experiments show that a prominent visual landmark is able to control HD responses within 24 hr of eye opening. Together, the results suggest that the directional network can be organized independently of visual spatial information while demonstrating the importance of patterned vision for accurate and reliable orientation in space.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25660541      PMCID: PMC4331281          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


Results

The HD Cell Circuit Is Present at P12

We recorded 1,483 neurons from the dorsal pre-subiculum (PrSd) and 691 neurons from the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus (ADN) in rat pups aged postnatal day 12–20 (P12–P20). In total, 485 PrSd neurons and 371 ADN neurons were classified as head direction (HD) cells (33% and 54% of PrSd and ADN single units, respectively; see Experimental Procedures for classification criteria; recording locations are shown in Figure S1). Figure 1 shows polar plots of representative HD cells recorded at each sampled age from both PrSd and ADN. We recorded directional responses in rat pups as young as 12 days old, when rats still have fused eyelids and present very limited mobility [7, 8]. The number of HD cells and the quality of their directional signaling improved with age throughout the period sampled (Figures 2A–2D). An increase in HD cell firing rate was observed in the ADN, but not the PrSd (Figure S2).
Figure 1

Representative Examples of HD Cells Recorded from PrSd and ADN

(A and B) Polar plots for two successive trials are shown for each postnatal (P) day. The eye-opening (E) day for each pair of polar plots is shown in parentheses below the postnatal day. Numbers at top left of polar plots refer to peak firing rate (Hz), and those at top right refer to Rayleigh vector length (RV; see Experimental Procedures). Directional tuning curves for the first and second halves of Trial 1 are shown within brackets as miniature polar plots. Criteria for selected cells are as follows: RV and within-trial stability for Trial 1 and across-trial stability for Trial 1 versus Trial 2 all fall within 1 SD of the population mean for the relevant age and eye-opening group. See Figure S1 for recording locations.

Figure 2

HD Responses Are Present from P12/E-3 and Mature Rapidly after Eye Opening

(A and E) Proportion of HD cells recorded from the PrSd (blue) and ADN (red), in rat pups aged between 12 and 20 days, expressed as a percentage of total recorded cells in each area, grouped by postnatal age (A) or eye-opening day (E). E0 marks the day of eye opening. Dashed lines represent the p = 0.05 significance level for the percentage of HD cells matched for brain area and age or eye-opening day (see Experimental Procedures).

(B–D and F–H) Spatial firing properties of HD cells recorded from the PrSd (blue) and ADN (red) as a function of age (B–D) and eye-opening day (F–H). Shown are DI per spike, expressed in bits/sec (B and F); across-trial stability between two consecutive trials (C and G); and within-trial stability between the first and second halves of one trial (D and H). Both stability measures are calculated as the spatial correlations (r) of the respective directional plots. Solid lines represent the mean over cells (±SEM). Dashed lines represent the p = 0.05 level of expected mean value of spatiality based on spike-shuffled data.

Directional information (DI), a measure of the precision with which HD cells signal direction, was relatively low in younger pups, as reflected by broader directional tuning curves (Figure 1), and increased with age (Figure 2B; ANOVA age, F7,837 = 21.75, p < 0.001). Similarly, both within-trial and across-trial stability were low in the youngest animals and increased with age (across trial: Figure 2C, ANOVA age F7,539 = 21.70, p < 0.001; within trial: Figure 2D, ANOVA age, F7,835 = 58.30, p < 0.001). The across-trial stability of early HD cells (ADN and PrSd at P12 and PrSd at P13) was less than that expected by chance (Figure 2C; see Experimental Procedures). However, the within-trial stability was greater than expected by chance at all ages (Figure 2D), demonstrating that, even at P12, HD cells can maintain a stable directional fix throughout a recording session.

HD Signaling Is Present before and Dramatically Improves at Eye Opening

Rats are born functionally blind; their eyelids open during the second week of postnatal life. In the present experimental cohort, the median eye-opening age was P15 (range: P12–P16). The developmental changes in the HD cell circuit in relation to eye opening are shown in Figures 2E–2H, where the data are grouped by eye-opening day (E) rather than by chronological age. A significant number of HD cells can be recorded from both PrSd and ADN as early as 3 days before eye opening (E-3; Figures 1 and 2E). The transition between E-1 and E0 coincided with a sharp rise in the proportion of HD cells in both brain areas, with an increase by over 50% in PrSd (E-1: 17%; E0: 28%) and over 100% in ADN (E-1: 22%; E0: 48%). Eye opening also marks a dramatic increase in the stability and DI content of HD cells. In both brain areas, across- and within-trial stability were low and did not change significantly before eye opening (simple main effects [SMEs], E-3 versus E-1: across-trial PrSd, p = 0.35; across-trial ADN, p = 0.21; within-trial PrSd, p = 0.56; within-trial ADN, p = 0.08; Figures 2G and 2H), whereas a rapid increase in stability took place between E-1 and E0 (SMEs, E-1 versus E0: across-trial PrSd, p < 0.001; across-trial ADN, p = 0.006; within-trial PrSd, p < 0.001; within-trial ADN, p < 0.001). The DI of ADN HD cells showed the same developmental pattern, with the first significant day-on-day increase apparent between E-1 and E0 (SMEs, E-3 versus E-1: p = 0.22; SMEs, E-1 versus E0: p = 0.003; Figure 2F). For PrSd HD cells, however, the first significant improvement on pre-eye-opening DI values did not occur until E1 (SMEs, E-1 versus E1: p = 0.006), indicating a slower development of spatial tuning in this area.

HD Cells Are Controlled by a Visual Landmark 1 Day after Eye Opening

In adult rats, the preferred firing direction (PFD) of HD cells is strongly influenced by visual landmarks: angular displacement of a prominent distal visual cue will commonly lead to a corresponding rotation of HD cell PFDs [4]. We tested the salience of visual input in developing animals by rotating a single prominent landmark, exclusively accessible through vision (Figure 3A; Experimental Procedures). The earliest examples of simultaneously recorded HD cell ensembles following the landmark rotation occurred at P15, corresponding to either E0 or E1 (Figures 3B and 3C). The visual landmark exerted control only on a subset of HD ensembles at E0 (Figure 3E; V = 2.29, p = 0.81; for an explanation of the V test, see Supplemental Experimental Procedures), while from E1 onward, HD cell ensembles were significantly under visual cue control (V = 4.57, p = 0.02). The variance between animals’ mean PFD responses continued to decrease until E3–E5 (circular variance: E1, 0.52; E2, 0.15; E3–E5, 0.04), but there was no significant difference between the E1 and E3–E5 distributions, as assessed by Watson’s two-sample test of homogeneity (n = 20, test statistic = 0.104, p > 0.1). The integration of visual information into the HD circuit therefore appears to take place soon after eye opening, with around 24 hr required for visual cues to establish control over HD cell responses.
Figure 3

HD Cells Follow the Rotation of a Visual Landmark from as Early as P15/E0

(A) Schematic showing experimental method. A prominent visual landmark was rotated from its original position (Trial A) by 180°, to the opposite side of the recording environment (Trial B) (see Experimental Procedures for details).

(B and C) Earliest examples of simultaneously recorded HD cell ensembles over which a visual landmark exerts control (ADN, B; PrSd, C). Three example cells per ensemble are shown, recorded from the ADN (Rat 1, Rat 2) and the PrSd (Rat 3, Rat 4). Numbers at top left of polar plots indicate peak firing rate (Hz), and those at top right indicate RV (see Experimental Procedures).

(D and E) Mean rotations of preferred firing directions (PFDs), for all recorded ensembles of HD cells. Each circle represents the mean PFD rotation of an ensemble of simultaneously recorded HD cells; blue represents PrSd, and red represents ADN. In black, the grand mean (±SEM) of the rotations of all ensembles from each age (P) or eye-opening (E) group is shown.

Discussion

A Functional HD Circuit Can Be Organized Independently of Patterned Visual Input

The HD signal is foundational to an animal’s representation of space, as HD cells are, together with entorhinal border cells [9], among the first spatially modulated neurons within the hippocampal mapping system to reach maturity in the rat. Previous developmental studies indicated that the HD circuit is adult-like soon after eye opening [5, 6], in the third postnatal week (∼P16). The formation of the HD circuit must therefore occur during a period when the animal’s ability to sample spatial features of their environment is greatly restricted by limited mobility and rudimentary sensory input [7, 8, 10]. In the adult rat, HD cells rely on information about self-generated motion, notably from the vestibular system [11, 12], to update directional heading from moment to moment in a process called angular path integration. At the same time, they incorporate information about stable landmark cues in the environment to take directional “fixes” and correct for accrued path integration error [4, 13]. Visual landmarks exert particularly strong control over HD responses in the adult rat [4, 13, 14], to the point that they often override path integrative information when a conflict between these two inputs occurs [15-17]. More recent evidence [18] indicates that optic flow information can also exert control over anterior-thalamic HD signals, reinforcing the view that vision is the dominant input in controlling HD responses. In light of this experimental evidence, it is notable that the results presented here indicate that significant numbers of HD cells can be recorded from both PrSd and ADN in rat pups as early as 3 days before eye opening (E-3; Figure 2E; consistent with previous preliminary reports [R.F. Langston et al., 2010, FENS, abstract]; [H.M. Tan et al., 2010, Soc. Neurosci., abstract]). At this age, the nascent HD circuit is therefore likely encoding an orientation signal in the absence of visual input in the form of either discrete visual landmarks or visual velocity information from optic flow. From at least P12 onward, HD cells are able to maintain a consistent preferred direction within a recording session. Our results suggest that during early development, HD responses can be anchored to an external reference frame using non-visual environmental cues, most likely local olfactory and tactile cues. The only study testing auditory influence on adult HD cells failed to demonstrate auditory cue control over HD cell PFDs [13], and in pups, the ear canal is sealed until P12–P13 [10]. Auditory cues are therefore unlikely to support HD cell stability in very young animals. By contrast, olfaction is available to rats very early during development [19] and can exert control over adult HD cells [13], while tactile information could be gathered through active whisking, which emerges at around P10–P13 in the rat [20]. The HD circuit is widely modeled using a neural architecture called a continuous attractor network [21-25]. Where the development of spatial continuous attractors has been studied, models have relied on fixed, spatially tuned inputs to set up attractor connectivity as the network matures [26-28]. In the case of HD cells, this fixed reference input has been assumed to be a distal visual landmark [26, 27], as such landmarks remain in a fixed allocentric direction as the animal moves around the environment. Our results suggest, instead, that modalities other than vision may underpin the organization of the incipient HD circuit and that local rather than distal cues may play a critical role.

The Onset of Patterned Vision Prompts the Rapid Maturation of the HD System

Eye opening marks the onset of patterned vision, which affords access to discrete visual landmarks and optic flow. Coincident with eye opening, both the percentage of HD responses and their quality increase dramatically (Figures 2E–2H), suggesting that the sudden access to patterned visual information (both local and distal) spurs a sharp improvement in the HD system. The increase in HD cells at eye opening is particularly pronounced in the ADN, raising the possibility that visual input is critical to ADN HD responses. A prominent distal landmark (only accessible via vision) can gain control over HD cell responses within 24 hr of eye opening. Given the protracted development of the visual system in the rat (with responses to visual stimuli in V1 still immature at P23 [29]), this is a striking demonstration of how rapidly visual information is incorporated into the HD system. Notably, the PFDs of simultaneously recorded cells appear to be coupled (Figures 3B and 3C) such that the angular difference between them stays constant [13] even upon rotation, supporting the view that a continuous attractor network architecture [21-25] may already be in place by the time of eye opening in the rat. In summary, our findings at once confirm the significance of vision for accurate spatial representation, while challenging the prediction that it is required for the early organization of incipient spatial networks. We establish the possibility that an integrative sensory-motor circuit can develop in the absence of a sensory modality that is understood to be critical in its adult state yet is nonetheless primed to incorporate input from that modality immediately upon its availability.

Experimental Procedures

Subjects

37 male Lister Hooded rats (PrS n = 27; ADN n = 10), aged P10–P20 and weighing 18–29 g at the time of surgery, were used as subjects. Pups were checked at the beginning and end of each day for evidence of eye opening. The first day on which at least one of the eyelids had opened was labeled E0.

Surgery and Electrodes

Rats were implanted with 4–8 tetrodes at the following stereotaxic coordinates: for ADN, 1.7 mm posterior to bregma, 1.2 mm lateral to the midline, and 4.2 mm ventral from bregma; for PrSd, 1.6 mm anterior to the sinus, 2.45 mm lateral to the midline, and 2.15 mm ventral from the cortical surface. Tetrode position was confirmed by postmortem Nissl staining.

Single-Unit Recording

Single-unit data were acquired using the DACQ system (Axona). Position and directional heading were recorded using a two-light tracking system, placed in a fixed orientation relative to the animal’s head. Isolation of single units from tetrode-recorded data was performed manually on the basis of peak-to-trough amplitude and principal components using the TINT software package (Axona) with the aid of KlustaKwik [30] automated clustering.

Behavioral Testing

Single-unit recording trials took place in one of two recording arenas. (1) To test for the presence of HD cells and assess spatial firing properties, we used a square box (62.5 cm side length, 50 cm high), painted light gray and placed on a black platform within the open laboratory. (2) For visual landmark rotation trials, was used a light gray wooden cylinder (79 cm diameter, 50 cm high), centered within a circular set of black curtains. The only spatially polarizing cue was a white card, placed 55 cm outside the walls of the recording arena. On rotation trials, the white card was moved by 180°, while the floor and arena remained in the same position. Animals were disoriented before entering the curtained enclosure.

Classification of Single Units as HD Cells

Only sessions in which the linear path length exceeded 15.7 m, the angular path length exceeded the equivalent of 43 head turns, and cells fired at least 100 spikes in a recording session were included in further analysis. Single units were classified as HD cells if the mean resultant vector length (Rayleigh vector, RV) of the polar plot exceeded a threshold defined as the 95th percentile of a population of RV scores derived from age- and brain area-matched spatially shuffled data [5].

Quantitative Analysis of Directional Signaling

DI is an estimate of the mutual information I(R|X) between firing rate R and direction X. I(R|X) is divided by the overall mean firing rate of the cell in the trial, giving a final estimate in bits/spike [31]. Across-trial stability was defined as the correlation (Pearson’s r) between spatially corresponding bins from two consecutive trials. Intra-trial stability was defined as the correlation between spatially corresponding bins from the first and second half of a single trial. The rotation of HD cell PFDs (following visual landmark rotation) was defined as the rotation of the baseline polar plot relative to the landmark rotation polar plot, which yielded the highest correlation between them.

Statistical Analysis

p = 0.05 levels for the percentages of HD cells were derived from a binomial distribution, based on the number of units recorded and assuming a false-positive HD classification rate of 5%. For all measures of directional signaling, the p = 0.05 levels were derived from the 95th percentiles of distributions of mean directionality scores, drawn from matched numbers of spatially shuffled polar plots [5]. Developmental trends in HD cell firing were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA (age and area, or eye-opening day and area), and post hoc tests were SMEs. PFD rotation was assessed using the Watson-Williams test and the V test [32], with a specified response of 180°. A detailed description of experimental methods can be found in Supplemental Experimental Procedures.

Author Contributions

H.M.T., J.P.B., F.C., and T.J.W. designed the experiments and analyses. H.M.T. and J.P.B. collected the data, and H.M.T. and T.J.W. analyzed the data. H.M.T. assembled the figures, and all authors contributed to drafting the manuscript.
  27 in total

1.  Modeling attractor deformation in the rodent head-direction system.

Authors:  J P Goodridge; D S Touretzky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements.

Authors:  K D Harris; D A Henze; J Csicsvari; H Hirase; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Rapid spatial reorientation and head direction cells.

Authors:  Michaël B Zugaro; Angelo Arleo; Alain Berthoz; Sidney I Wiener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Self-organizing continuous attractor networks and path integration: one-dimensional models of head direction cells.

Authors:  S M Stringer; T P Trappenberg; E T Rolls; I E T de Araujo
Journal:  Network       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.273

5.  Hippocampal spatial representations require vestibular input.

Authors:  Robert W Stackman; Ann S Clark; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Emergence of neural integration in the head-direction system by visual supervision.

Authors:  R H R Hahnloser
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II. Effects of environmental manipulations.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Postnatal development of locomotion in the laboratory rat.

Authors:  J Altman; K Sudarshan
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Influence of conflicting visual, inertial and substratal cues on head direction cell activity.

Authors:  M B Zugaro; E Tabuchi; S I Wiener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Optimal cue combination and landmark-stability learning in the head direction system.

Authors:  Kate J Jeffery; Hector J I Page; Simon M Stringer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Bridging the gap between spatial and mnemonic views of the hippocampal formation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Buffalo
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Anticipatory Neural Activity Improves the Decoding Accuracy for Dynamic Head-Direction Signals.

Authors:  Johannes Zirkelbach; Martin Stemmler; Andreas V M Herz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Postnatal Development of Functional Projections from Parasubiculum and Presubiculum to Medial Entorhinal Cortex in the Rat.

Authors:  Cathrin B Canto; Noriko Koganezawa; Mariá José Lagartos-Donate; Kally C O'Reilly; Huibert D Mansvelder; Menno P Witter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Postnatal development of projections of the postrhinal cortex to the entorhinal cortex in the rat.

Authors:  Maria Jose Lagartos-Donate; Thanh Pierre Doan; Paulo J B Girão; Menno P Witter
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 6.  The effects of developmental alcohol exposure on the neurobiology of spatial processing.

Authors:  Ryan E Harvey; Laura E Berkowitz; Derek A Hamilton; Benjamin J Clark
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Transformation of the head-direction signal into a spatial code.

Authors:  Adrien Peyrache; Natalie Schieferstein; Gyorgy Buzsáki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Postnatal development of retrosplenial projections to the parahippocampal region of the rat.

Authors:  Jørgen Sugar; Menno P Witter
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Structural development and dorsoventral maturation of the medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Saikat Ray; Michael Brecht
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Thalamic and Entorhinal Network Activity Differently Modulates the Functional Development of Prefrontal-Hippocampal Interactions.

Authors:  Henrike Hartung; Marco D Brockmann; Beatrice Pöschel; Vito De Feo; Ileana L Hanganu-Opatz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.