Literature DB >> 9733184

Cue control and head direction cells.

J P Goodridge1, P A Dudchenko, K A Worboys, E J Golob, J S Taube.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that head direction (HD) cells in both the anterior dorsal thalamus (ADN) and the postsubiculum (PoS) in rats discharge in relation to familiar, visual landmarks in the environment. This study assessed whether PoS and ADN HD cells would be similarly responsive to nonvisual or unfamiliar environmental cues. After visual input was eliminated by blindfolding the rats, HD cells maintained direction-specific discharge, but their preferred firing directions became less stable. In addition, rotations of the behavioral apparatus indicated that some nonvisual cues (presumably tactile, olfactory, or both) exerted above chance stimulus control over a cell's preferred firing direction. However, a prominent auditory cue was not effective in exerting stimulus control over a cell's preferred direction. HD cell activity also was assessed after rotation of a novel visual cue exposed to the rat for 1, 3, or 8 min. An 8-min exposure was enough time for a novel visual cue to gain control over a cell's preferred direction, whereas an exposure of 1 or 3 min led to control in only about half the sessions. These latter results indicate that HD cells rely on a rapid learning mechanism to develop associations with landmark cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9733184     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.112.4.749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  83 in total

1.  Head direction cells in rats with hippocampal or overlying neocortical lesions: evidence for impaired angular path integration.

Authors:  E J Golob; J S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Rapid spatial reorientation and head direction cells.

Authors:  Michaël B Zugaro; Angelo Arleo; Alain Berthoz; Sidney I Wiener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Hippocampal spatial representations require vestibular input.

Authors:  Robert W Stackman; Ann S Clark; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Environmental boundaries as a mechanism for correcting and anchoring spatial maps.

Authors:  Lisa M Giocomo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  How environment and self-motion combine in neural representations of space.

Authors:  Talfan Evans; Andrej Bicanski; Daniel Bush; Neil Burgess
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  A role for terrain slope in orienting hippocampal place fields.

Authors:  Kathryn J Jeffery; Rakesh L Anand; Michael I Anderson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A continuous attractor network model without recurrent excitation: maintenance and integration in the head direction cell system.

Authors:  Christian Boucheny; Nicolas Brunel; Angelo Arleo
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Head direction cell activity in mice: robust directional signal depends on intact otolith organs.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Head direction cell instability in the anterior dorsal thalamus after lesions of the interpeduncular nucleus.

Authors:  Benjamin J Clark; Asha Sarma; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.