Literature DB >> 27479741

Optimal cue combination and landmark-stability learning in the head direction system.

Kate J Jeffery1, Hector J I Page1, Simon M Stringer2.   

Abstract

Maintaining a sense of direction requires combining information from static environmental landmarks with dynamic information about self-motion. This is accomplished by the head direction system, whose neurons - head direction cells - encode specific head directions. When the brain integrates information in sensory domains, this process is almost always 'optimal' - that is, inputs are weighted according to their reliability. Evidence suggests cue combination by head direction cells may also be optimal. The simplicity of the head direction signal, together with the detailed knowledge we have about the anatomy and physiology of the underlying circuit, therefore makes this system a tractable model with which to discover how optimal cue combination occurs at a neural level. In the head direction system, cue interactions are thought to occur on an attractor network of interacting head direction neurons, but attractor dynamics predict a winner-take-all decision between cues, rather than optimal combination. However, optimal cue combination in an attractor could be achieved via plasticity in the feedforward connections from external sensory cues (i.e. the landmarks) onto the ring attractor. Short-term plasticity would allow rapid re-weighting that adjusts the final state of the network in accordance with cue reliability (reflected in the connection strengths), while longer term plasticity would allow long-term learning about this reliability. Although these principles were derived to model the head direction system, they could potentially serve to explain optimal cue combination in other sensory systems more generally.
© 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.

Keywords:  attractor networks; cue combination; sensory integration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27479741      PMCID: PMC5108898          DOI: 10.1113/JP272945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  39 in total

1.  A model of the neural basis of the rat's sense of direction.

Authors:  W E Skaggs; J J Knierim; H S Kudrimoti; B L McNaughton
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  1995

2.  Background, but not foreground, spatial cues are taken as references for head direction responses by rat anterodorsal thalamus neurons.

Authors:  M B Zugaro; A Berthoz; S I Wiener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Alexandre Pouget; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Cortical connections between rat cingulate cortex and visual, motor, and postsubicular cortices.

Authors:  B A Vogt; M W Miller
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-05-10       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Learned interaction of visual and idiothetic cues in the control of place field orientation.

Authors:  K J Jeffery; J M O'Keefe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?

Authors:  David C Knill; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation.

Authors:  J S Taube; H L Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A theoretical account of cue averaging in the rodent head direction system.

Authors:  Hector J I Page; Daniel M Walters; Rebecca Knight; Caitlin E Piette; Kathryn J Jeffery; Simon M Stringer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  8 in total

1.  Testing the Efficacy of Single-Cell Stimulation in Biasing Presubicular Head Direction Activity.

Authors:  Stefano Coletta; Markus Frey; Khaled Nasr; Patricia Preston-Ferrer; Andrea Burgalossi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Attractor-like Dynamics in the Subicular Complex.

Authors:  Apoorv Sharma; Indrajith R Nair; Doreswamy Yoganarasimha
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Neural mechanisms for spatial computation.

Authors:  Matthew F Nolan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Efficacy of navigation may be influenced by retrosplenial cortex-mediated learning of landmark stability.

Authors:  Stephen D Auger; Peter Zeidman; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  A decentralised neural model explaining optimal integration of navigational strategies in insects.

Authors:  Xuelong Sun; Shigang Yue; Michael Mangan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction.

Authors:  Sevan K Harootonian; Arne D Ekstrom; Robert C Wilson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Retrosplenial cortex and its role in spatial cognition.

Authors:  Anna S Mitchell; Rafal Czajkowski; Ningyu Zhang; Kate Jeffery; Andrew J D Nelson
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2018-03-19

8.  Human cortical dynamics during full-body heading changes.

Authors:  Klaus Gramann; Friederike U Hohlefeld; Lukas Gehrke; Marius Klug
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.