Literature DB >> 24133279

Optic flow stimuli update anterodorsal thalamus head direction neuronal activity in rats.

Angelo Arleo1, Cyril Déjean, Pierre Allegraud, Mehdi Khamassi, Michael B Zugaro, Sidney I Wiener.   

Abstract

Head direction (HD) neurons fire selectively according to head orientation in the yaw plane relative to environmental landmark cues. Head movements provoke optic field flow signals that enter the vestibular nuclei, indicating head velocity, and hence angular displacements. To test whether optic field flow alone affects the directional firing of HD neurons, rats walked about on a circular platform as a spot array was projected onto the surrounding floor-to-ceiling cylindrical black curtain. Directional responses in the anterodorsal thalamus of four rats remained stable as they moved about with the point field but in the absence of landmark cues. Then, the spherical projector was rotated about its yaw axis at 4.5°/s for ∼90 s. In 27 sessions the mean drift speed of the preferred directions (PDs) was 1.48°/s (SD=0.78°/s; range: 0.15 to 2.88°/s). Thus, optic flow stimulation entrained PDs, albeit at drift speeds slower than the field rotation. This could be due to conflicts with vestibular, motor command, and efferent copy signals. After field rotation ended, 20/27 PDs drifted back to within 45° of the initial values over several minutes, generally following the shortest path to return to the initial value. Poststimulation drifts could change speed and/or direction, with mean speeds of 0.68±0.64°/s (range 0 to 1.36°/s). Since the HD cell pathway (containing anterodorsal thalamus) is the only known projection of head direction information to entorhinal grid cells and hippocampal place cells, yaw plane optic flow signals likely influence representations in this spatial reference coordinate system for orientation and navigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24133279      PMCID: PMC6618532          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2698-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  8 in total

Review 1.  Origin and role of path integration in the cognitive representations of the hippocampus: computational insights into open questions.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Our sense of direction: progress, controversies and challenges.

Authors:  Kathleen E Cullen; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Head direction is coded more strongly than movement direction in a population of entorhinal neurons.

Authors:  Florian Raudies; Mark P Brandon; G William Chapman; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Grid cell spatial tuning reduced following systemic muscarinic receptor blockade.

Authors:  Ehren L Newman; Jason R Climer; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  The development of the head direction system before eye opening in the rat.

Authors:  Hui Min Tan; Joshua Pope Bassett; John O'Keefe; Francesca Cacucci; Thomas Joseph Wills
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  How the cerebellum may monitor sensory information for spatial representation.

Authors:  Laure Rondi-Reig; Anne-Lise Paradis; Julie M Lefort; Benedicte M Babayan; Christine Tobin
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-04

7.  Encoding of 3D head direction information in the human brain.

Authors:  Misun Kim; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Vestibular activity and cognitive development in children: perspectives.

Authors:  Sylvette R Wiener-Vacher; Derek A Hamilton; Sidney I Wiener
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.