| Literature DB >> 25646058 |
Jae-Yoon Yoon1, Jong Kyung Na2, Chan Kee Park2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We compared the abilities of Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT), Heidelberg retinal tomography (HRT) and standard automated perimetry (SAP) to detect the progression of normal tension glaucoma (NTG) in patients whose eyes displayed localized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect enlargements.Entities:
Keywords: Glaucoma progression; Heidelberg retinal tomography; Low tension glaucoma; Optical coherence tomography; Standard automated perimetry
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25646058 PMCID: PMC4309866 DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2015.29.1.31
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Ophthalmol ISSN: 1011-8942
Fig. 1Detection rate of progression by each diagnostic test in 47 patients having an eye with normal tension glaucoma that displayed progression, defined as enlargement of a localized retinal nerve fiber layer defect on red-free fundus photography. SAP = standard automated perimetry; HRT = Heidelberg retinal tomography; OCT = optical coherence tomography.
Fig. 2Comparison of methods for detecting disease progression. Sample included 47 patients with normal tension glaucoma who were assessed for enlargement of the localized retinal nerve fiber layer by red-free fundus photography. Data shows detecting disease progression according to glaucoma severity (A, mild glaucoma; B, moderate glaucoma; C, severe glaucoma). MD = mean deviation; SAP = standard automated perimetry; OCT = optical coherence tomography; HRT = Heidelberg retinal tomography.
Detection rate of progression by representative parameters in each test
Demographics of progressed and non-progressed normal tension glaucoma groups
RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer.
*Indicates p < 0.05.
Comparison of parameters by standard automated perimetry between patients with progressed and non-progressed normal tension glaucoma
*Indicates p < 0.05.
Comparison of parameters by optic nerve head analysis using optical coherence tomography between patients with progressed and non-progressed normal tension glaucoma
*Indicates p < 0.05.
Comparison of parameters by retinal nerve fiber layer analysis using optical coherence tomography between patients with progressed and non-progressed normal tension glaucoma
Imax = inferior maximum thickness; Smax = superior maximum thickness; Savg = superior average thickness; Iavg = inferior average thickness; Avg = average thickness.
*Indicates p < 0.05.
Comparison of parameters by Heidelberg retinal tomography between patients with progressed and non-progressed normal tension glaucoma
*Indicates p < 0.05.
Changes in the progression rates of each significant parameter in patients with progressed and non-progressed normal tension glaucoma
SAP = standard automated perimetry; MD = mean deviation; PSD = pattern standard deviation; OCT = optical coherence tomography; VIRA = vertical integrated rim area; Avg = average; HRT = Heidelberg retinal tomography; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer.
*Indicates p < 0.05.