Literature DB >> 12566017

Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): II. Comparison of optic disk and visual field characteristics.

Chris A Johnson1, Pamela A Sample, Linda M Zangwill, Cristiana G Vasile, George A Cioffi, Jeffrey R Liebmann, Robert N Weinreb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between glaucomatous structural damage to the optic nerve and development of visual field loss with standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
DESIGN: Cohort study.
METHODS: Patients with elevated intraocular pressure and normal SAP visual fields were enrolled in this prospective study. Stereo optic disk photographs, SAP, and SWAP visual fields were obtained annually over a period of 4 or more years. Trained readers evaluated baseline and follow-up optic disk photographs for evidence of glaucomatous damage. Standard automated perimetry and SWAP examinations were evaluated according to previously validated criteria for development of confirmed visual field changes.
RESULTS: Two-hundred ninety-five subjects (479 eyes) were enrolled. Following masked assessment of stereo photographs by an optic disk reading center, 272 of the 479 eyes were judged to have glaucomatous optic neuropathy at the time of study entry. Depending on the criteria employed, approximately 10% to 17.5% of all eyes developed confirmed visual field loss for SAP (conversions). Of the conversions, 75% to 80% had baseline glaucomatous optic disk damage, whereas normal and glaucomatous optic disks were equally divided (50%) among the nonconversion eyes. This difference was statistically significant (P <.003). Depending on the criteria employed, 4% to 12% of the eyes had confirmed SWAP deficits at baseline, and 4% to 8% developed confirmed SWAP defects at a follow-up examination. There was a greater percentage of eyes with a glaucomatous optic neuropathy in the group with SWAP deficits (75%-100%) than for those eyes in which SWAP remained normal (45%-60%). Some of these differences were statistically significant (P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A strong relationship exists between glaucomatous optic disk damage at study entry and the subsequent development of a confirmed glaucomatous SAP visual field defect. A higher percentage of glaucomatous optic disks were also found in patients with SWAP deficits at baseline and in those who later developed SWAP deficits. These findings support the premise that a glaucomatous optic disk is predictive of the subsequent development of glaucomatous visual field loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12566017     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01930-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  31 in total

1.  Glaucoma is present prior to its detection with standard automated perimetry: is it time to change our concepts?

Authors:  Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Scanning laser polarimetry with variable and enhanced corneal compensation in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Mitra Sehi; Delia C Guaqueta; William J Feuer; David S Greenfield
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Asymmetries and visual field summaries as predictors of glaucoma in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Richard A Levine; Shaban Demirel; Juanjuan Fan; John L Keltner; Chris A Johnson; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Optic disc imaging in perimetrically normal eyes of glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.

Authors:  Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Simon K Law; Federico Badalà
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

5.  Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma.

Authors:  Federico Badalà; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Duna A Raoof; Narakorn Leeprechanon; Simon K Law; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Why Do People (Still) Go Blind from Glaucoma?

Authors:  Remo Susanna; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Comparison of different spectral domain OCT scanning protocols for diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Renato Lisboa; Augusto Paranhos; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Mauro T Leite; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy is associated with visual field loss over time in glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Mitra Sehi; Xinbo Zhang; David S Greenfield; Yunsuk Chung; Gadi Wollstein; Brian A Francis; Joel S Schuman; Rohit Varma; David Huang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry.

Authors:  Minna Ng; Lyne Racette; John P Pascual; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Sarah L Lovell; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  New nonlinear multivariable model shows the relationship between central corneal thickness and HRTII topographic parameters in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kourkoutas; Gerasimos Georgopoulos; Antonios Maragos; Ioannis Apostolakis; George Tsekouras; Irene S Karanasiou; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Evaggelos Iliakis; Michael Moschos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.