BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to assess the repeatability of spectral-domain-OCT (SD-OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) thickness measurements in a non-glaucoma group and patients with glaucoma and to compare these results to conventional time-domain-OCT (TD-OCT). METHODS: In a prospective, comparative, observational case-control study, 50 eyes of 25 non-glaucoma and 22 eyes of 11 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) were included. SD-OCT and TD-OCT circle scans were centered on the optic disc. In each eye, OCT scans were performed three times by two independent observers. RNFL thickness was measured in four quadrants around the optic disc. In addition, the overall mean RNFL thickness was assessed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (COV) were calculated. Inter-observer and inter-OCT repeatability was visualized by using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Intra-observer repeatability for TD- OCT was good with an ICC(mean RNFL thickness) of 0.939 in non-glaucomas and 0.980 in glaucomatous eyes. For SD-OCT, intra-observer repeatability was higher with an ICC of 0.989 for non-glaucomas and 0.997 for glaucomatous eyes. COVs for TD-OCT ranged from 2.9-7.7% in non-glaucomas and from 6.0-13.3% in glaucoma patients. COVs for SD-OCT ranged from 0.3-1% in non-glaucomas and from 0.9-2.3% in glaucomatous eyes. COVs were influenced by various factors. In the glaucoma group, COVs were significantly higher (p < 0.001) compared to the non-glaucoma group. COVs increased by a mean of 5.1% when TD-OCT was used instead of SD-OCT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SD-OCT RNFL thickness measurements in healthy volunteers and glaucoma patients showed good intra- and inter-observer repeatability. Especially in glaucomatous eyes, repeatability of SD-OCT was superior to TD-OCT.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to assess the repeatability of spectral-domain-OCT (SD-OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) thickness measurements in a non-glaucoma group and patients with glaucoma and to compare these results to conventional time-domain-OCT (TD-OCT). METHODS: In a prospective, comparative, observational case-control study, 50 eyes of 25 non-glaucoma and 22 eyes of 11 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) were included. SD-OCT and TD-OCT circle scans were centered on the optic disc. In each eye, OCT scans were performed three times by two independent observers. RNFL thickness was measured in four quadrants around the optic disc. In addition, the overall mean RNFL thickness was assessed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (COV) were calculated. Inter-observer and inter-OCT repeatability was visualized by using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Intra-observer repeatability for TD- OCT was good with an ICC(mean RNFL thickness) of 0.939 in non-glaucomas and 0.980 in glaucomatous eyes. For SD-OCT, intra-observer repeatability was higher with an ICC of 0.989 for non-glaucomas and 0.997 for glaucomatous eyes. COVs for TD-OCT ranged from 2.9-7.7% in non-glaucomas and from 6.0-13.3% in glaucomapatients. COVs for SD-OCT ranged from 0.3-1% in non-glaucomas and from 0.9-2.3% in glaucomatous eyes. COVs were influenced by various factors. In the glaucoma group, COVs were significantly higher (p < 0.001) compared to the non-glaucoma group. COVs increased by a mean of 5.1% when TD-OCT was used instead of SD-OCT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SD-OCT RNFL thickness measurements in healthy volunteers and glaucomapatients showed good intra- and inter-observer repeatability. Especially in glaucomatous eyes, repeatability of SD-OCT was superior to TD-OCT.
Authors: Lelia A Paunescu; Joel S Schuman; Lori Lyn Price; Paul C Stark; Siobahn Beaton; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; James G Fujimoto Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mauro T Leite; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Harsha L Rao; Luciana M Alencar; Pamela A Sample; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Maciej Wojtkowski; Vivek J Srinivasan; James G Fujimoto; Jay S Duker; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Donald L Budenz; Robert T Chang; Xiangrun Huang; Robert W Knighton; James M Tielsch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Delia Bendschneider; Ralf P Tornow; Folkert K Horn; Robert Laemmer; Christopher W Roessler; Anselm G Juenemann; Friedrich E Kruse; Christian Y Mardin Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Kyungmoo Lee; Milan Sonka; Young H Kwon; Mona K Garvin; Michael D Abràmoff Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marta Para-Prieto; Raul Martin; Sara Crespo; Laura Mena-Garcia; Andres Valisena; Lisandro Cordero; Gloria Gonzalez Fernandez; Juan F Arenillas; Nieves Tellez; Jose Carlos Pastor Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-05-14