Literature DB >> 22921160

Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.

Tamar van Haaren-Ten Haken1, Marijke Hendrix, Marianne Nieuwenhuijze, Luc Budé, Raymond de Vries, Jan Nijhuis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to explores preferences, characteristics and motives regarding place of birth of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.
DESIGN: a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women and their partners starting their pregnancy in midwifery-led care or in obstetric-led care. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, including questions on demographic, psychosocial and pregnancy factors and statements about motives with regard to place of birth. Depression, worry and self-esteem were explored using the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS), the Cambridge Worry Scale (CWS) and the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSE).
SETTING: participants were recruited in 100 independent midwifery practices and 14 hospitals from 2007 to 2011. PARTICIPANTS: 550 low-risk nulliparous women; 231 women preferred a home birth, 170 women a hospital birth in midwifery-led care and 149 women a birth in obstetric-led care.
FINDINGS: Significant differences in characteristics were found in the group who preferred a birth in obstetric-led care compared to the two groups who preferred midwifery-led care. Those women were older (F (2,551)=16.14, p<0.001), had a higher family income (χ(2) (6)=18.87, p=0.004), were more frequently pregnant after assisted reproduction (χ(2)(2)=35.90, p<0.001) and had a higher rate of previous miscarriage (χ(2)(2)=25.96, p<0.001). They also differed significantly on a few emotional aspects: more women in obstetric-led care had symptoms of a major depressive disorder (χ(2)(2)=6.54, p=0.038) and were worried about health issues (F (2,410)=8.90, p<0.001). Women's choice for a home birth is driven by a desire for greater personal autonomy, whereas women's choice for a hospital birth is driven by a desire to feel safe and control risks. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: the characteristics of women who prefer a hospital birth are different than the characteristics of women who prefer a home birth. It appears that for women preferring a hospital birth, the assumed safety of the hospital is more important than type of care provider. This brings up the question whether women are fully aware of the possibilities of maternity care services. Women might need concrete information about the availability and the characteristics of the services within the maternity care system and the risks and benefits associated with either setting, in order to make an informed choice where to give birth.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921160     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  16 in total

1.  Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Berglind Halfdansdottir; Margaret E Wilson; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Olof A Olafsdottir; Alexander Kr Smarason; Herdis Sveinsdottir
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-11

2.  Women's Preferences for Birthing Hospital in Denmark: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Nasrin Tayyari Dehbarez; Morten Raun Mørkbak; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Niels Uldbjerg; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  U.S. Nulliparas' Reasons for Expected Provider Type and Childbirth Setting.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

4.  Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Ank de Jonge; Jeanette A J M Mesman; Judith Manniën; Joost J Zwart; Jeroen van Dillen; Jos van Roosmalen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-06-13

5.  Severe Adverse Maternal Outcomes among Women in Midwife-Led versus Obstetrician-Led Care at the Onset of Labour in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ank de Jonge; Jeanette A J M Mesman; Judith Manniën; Joost J Zwart; Simone E Buitendijk; Jos van Roosmalen; Jeroen van Dillen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Birth setting, transfer and maternal sense of control: results from the DELIVER study.

Authors:  Caroline C Geerts; Trudy Klomp; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen; Jos W R Twisk; Jeroen van Dillen; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Pregnancy related anxiety and general anxious or depressed mood and the choice for birth setting: a secondary data-analysis of the DELIVER study.

Authors:  A B Witteveen; P De Cock; A C Huizink; A De Jonge; T Klomp; M Westerneng; C C Geerts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Satisfaction with caregivers during labour among low risk women in the Netherlands: the association with planned place of birth and transfer of care during labour.

Authors:  Caroline C Geerts; Jeroen van Dillen; Trudy Klomp; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Women's birth place preferences in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Hollowell; Yangmei Li; Reem Malouf; James Buchanan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Cost-effectiveness of planned birth in a birth centre compared with alternative planned places of birth: results of the Dutch Birth Centre study.

Authors:  Marit Hitzert; Marieke Maa Hermus; Inge Ic Boesveld; Arie Franx; Karin Km van der Pal-de Bruin; Eric Eap Steegers; EIske Me van den Akker-van Marle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.