Literature DB >> 21252776

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 476: planned home birth.

.   

Abstract

Although the Committee on Obstetric Practice believes that hospitals and birthing centers are the safest setting for birth, it respects the right of a woman to make a medically informed decision about delivery. Women inquiring about planned home birth should be informed of its risks and benefits based on recent evidence. Specifically, they should be informed that although the absolute risk may be low, planned home birth is associated with a twofold to threefold increased risk of neonatal death when compared with planned hospital birth. Importantly, women should be informed that the appropriate selection of candidates for home birth; the availability of a certified nurse–midwife, certified midwife, or physician practicing within an integrated and regulated health system; ready access to consultation; and assurance of safe and timely transport to nearby hospitals are critical to reducing perinatal mortality rates and achieving favorable home birth outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21252776     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820eee20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Berglind Halfdansdottir; Margaret E Wilson; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Olof A Olafsdottir; Alexander Kr Smarason; Herdis Sveinsdottir
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-11

2.  Institutional and Cultural Perspectives on Home Birth in Israel.

Authors:  Michal Rosie Meroz; Anat Gesser-Edelsburg
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

Review 3.  Home Birth Midwifery in the United States : Evolutionary Origins and Modern Challenges.

Authors:  Bria Dunham
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-12

4.  Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Amos Grünebaum; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pivoting to Childbirth at Home or in Freestanding Birth Centers in the US During COVID-19: Safety, Economics and Logistics.

Authors:  Betty-Anne Daviss; David A Anderson; Kenneth C Johnson
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-03-26

6.  Protocol: systematic review and meta-analyses of birth outcomes for women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital.

Authors:  Eileen K Hutton; Angela Reitsma; Julia Thorpe; Ginny Brunton; Karyn Kaufman
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-29

7.  Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants.

Authors:  Amos Grünebaum; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin; Robert L Brent; Malcolm I Levene; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.