Literature DB >> 18602202

Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth.

Helena E Lindgren1, Ingela J Rådestad, Kyllike Christensson, Kristina Wally-Bystrom, Ingegerd M Hildingsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: home birth is not included in the Swedish health-care system and the rate for planned home births is less than one in a thousand. The aim of this study was to describe women's perceptions of risk related to childbirth and the strategies for managing these perceived risks. DESIGN AND
SETTING: a nationwide study including all women who had given birth at home in Sweden was conducted between 1 January 1992 and 31 July 2005. PARTICIPANTS: a total of 735 women had given birth to 1038 children. Of the 1038 questionnaires sent to the women, 1025 (99%) were returned. MEASUREMENTS: two open questions regarding risk related to childbirth and two questions answered using a scale were investigated by content analysis.
FINDINGS: regarding perceived risks about hospital birth, three categories, all related to loss of autonomy, were identified: (1) being in the hands of strangers; (2) being in the hands of routines and unnecessary interventions; and (3) being in the hands of structural conditions. Perceived risks related to a home birth were associated with a sense of being beyond help: (1) worst-case scenario; and (2) distance to the hospital. The perceived risks were managed by using extrovert activities and introvert behaviour, and by avoiding discussions concerning risks with health-care professionals.
CONCLUSION: women who plan for a home birth in Sweden do consider risks related to childbirth but they avoid talking about the risks with health-care professionals. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: to understand why women choose to give birth at home, health-care professionals must learn about the perceived beneficial effect of doing so. Copyright 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18602202     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  7 in total

1.  Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Berglind Halfdansdottir; Margaret E Wilson; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Olof A Olafsdottir; Alexander Kr Smarason; Herdis Sveinsdottir
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-11

2.  In search of a common agenda for planned home birth in america.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

3.  Pregnancy related anxiety and general anxious or depressed mood and the choice for birth setting: a secondary data-analysis of the DELIVER study.

Authors:  A B Witteveen; P De Cock; A C Huizink; A De Jonge; T Klomp; M Westerneng; C C Geerts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Respectful and disrespectful care in the Czech Republic: an online survey.

Authors:  Cecily Begley; Natalie Sedlicka; Deirdre Daly
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Strategies to increase uptake of maternal pertussis vaccination.

Authors:  Kavin M Patel; Laia Vazquez Guillamet; Lauren Pischel; Mallory K Ellingson; Azucena Bardají; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.683

6.  Outcomes for births booked under an independent midwife and births in NHS maternity units: matched comparison study.

Authors:  Andrew Symon; Clare Winter; Melanie Inkster; Peter T Donnan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-11

7.  Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martine Hollander; Esteriek de Miranda; Jeroen van Dillen; Irene de Graaf; Frank Vandenbussche; Lianne Holten
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.